Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware Exam 2V0-32.24 Topic 6 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-32.24 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 6
[All 2V0-32.24 Questions]

An administrator is configuring the log masking feature within vRealize Log Insight. Select the correct statement.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Log masking in vRealize Log Insight is applied to logs after the configuration has been created and enabled. It will only affect logs that are ingested after the log masking is activated, meaning that historical logs already ingested before the mask configuration will not be affected.


by Tawanna at May 04, 2025, 06:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-32.24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Charolette
30 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think B is incorrect because log mask configuration should take precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards D, because it mentions Dynamic fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
1 months ago
I think the correct statement is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 months ago
Wait, can we mask the 'FieldName' field itself? That would be like masking the mask! *chuckles* Anyway, I think A is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
9 days ago
User3: I agree, option A seems to be the correct statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
13 days ago
User2: Yeah, that would be like masking the mask!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
26 days ago
User1: I think we can't mask the 'FieldName' field itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
1 months ago
B is clearly wrong. The mask should take precedence over archival rules, otherwise what's the point of masking in the first place?
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I'll go with B as it talks about precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
2 months ago
Hmm, D sounds interesting. Being able to mask dynamic fields could be a useful feature. I'll have to look into that one further.
upvoted 0 times
Anabel
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I'm curious too. Let's check it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
1 months ago
User 1: D sounds like a useful feature. I wonder how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hui
2 months ago
But D sounds plausible too, especially with Dynamic fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
2 months ago
I believe it's C because it mentions all stored logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
2 months ago
I'll go with C. Masking should be applied to all logs, not just new ones. Otherwise, you'd have inconsistent masking across the log history.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
26 days ago
Definitely, it's important to have uniform masking across all logs for security and compliance reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
29 days ago
That makes sense. It ensures consistency in masking for all logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 months ago
C) A log mask configuration is applied to the all stored logs that after creating and enabling the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hui
2 months ago
I think the correct statement is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
3 months ago
Option A seems correct to me. The log mask should only apply to logs ingested after the configuration is enabled, not retroactively to all stored logs.
upvoted 0 times
Rosio
2 months ago
Yes, it's important to understand that the log mask configuration is applied moving forward, not retroactively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
2 months ago
I agree, it makes sense that the log mask wouldn't affect logs that were already stored before the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
I think option A is correct. The log mask only applies to logs ingested after the configuration is enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel