New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 2V0-32.22 Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-32.22 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All 2V0-32.22 Questions]

An administrator has been tasked with deploying vRealize Operations (vROps).

The requirements are:

* The deployment must consume a minimal amount of duster compute resources

* The deployment must be resilient against a single vROps node failure

Which option would meet the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Deploying vRealize Operations (vROps) with resilience and minimal resource consumption requires careful consideration of the deployment architecture. To meet the requirements of consuming minimal cluster compute resources while ensuring resilience against a single node failure, deploying vROps as a cluster with High Availability (HA) enabled is the optimal choice.

Understanding vROps High Availability (HA):

Architecture: In an HA configuration, vROps operates with a primary node and a replica node, along with data nodes as needed. The replica node mirrors the primary node's data, ensuring continuity in case of a failure.

Resource Efficiency: Enabling HA adds redundancy with minimal additional resource overhead compared to other high-availability configurations.

Failure Resilience: With HA enabled, if the primary node fails, the replica node seamlessly takes over, maintaining operational continuity without data loss.

Deployment Steps:

Initial Deployment:

Deploy the primary vROps node.

Add a replica node to enable HA.

Include additional data nodes if necessary, based on environment size and requirements.

Enable High Availability:

Access the vROps administration interface.

Navigate to the Cluster Management settings.

Enable the High Availability option.

Validation:

Ensure that the cluster status indicates HA is active.

Verify that the replica node is synchronized with the primary node.

Benefits of This Approach:

Minimal Resource Consumption: Deploying a primary and a replica node, with HA enabled, uses fewer resources compared to configurations like Continuous Availability (CA), which require more nodes and higher resource allocation.

Resilience: The HA setup ensures that the system can withstand a single node failure without service disruption, meeting the specified resilience requirement.


For detailed information on vROps deployment and HA configuration, consult VMware's official documentation:

vRealize Operations Manager High Availability Configuration

Deploying vRealize Operations Manager

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Audra
3 months ago
I’m not sure about C, seems like it wouldn't meet the resilience requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
3 months ago
Definitely going with B, it’s the standard for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
4 months ago
Wait, can CA really handle a node failure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
4 months ago
I think D could work too, but not as resilient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
4 months ago
Option B is the best choice for HA!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
4 months ago
I feel like deploying Remote Collector nodes might not provide the resilience needed for a single node failure, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where deploying as a cluster was the right answer, but I can't remember if it was specifically about HA or just clustering in general.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
5 months ago
I think High Availability is the way to go here since it can handle node failures, but I can't recall if it consumes more resources than a standard cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
I remember that Continuous Availability is more about minimizing downtime, but I'm not sure if it really fits the minimal resource requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
5 months ago
Deploying Remote Collector nodes in a Collector Group could be an interesting approach to meet the minimal compute requirement, but I'm not sure if that fully addresses the single node failure aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
5 months ago
Based on the requirements, I'm leaning towards deploying vROps as a cluster and enabling HA. That should provide the resilience needed while still being resource-efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between Continuous Availability (CA) and High Availability (HA) in vROps. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward vROps deployment question. I think the key is to focus on the requirements of minimal compute resources and resilience against a single node failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also work since deploying vRealize Operations as a cluster should provide some level of resilience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 year ago
I agree with Helaine, deploying vRealize Operations as a cluster and enabling High Availability would ensure resilience against a single node failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
1 year ago
Clustering vROps? Sounds like a party! Option D is my pick, though I hope they don't serve any 'cluster headaches' at this deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 year ago
I'm feeling a bit like a vROps mathematician here - gotta find the minimal solution. Option C with those Remote Collector nodes seems like the way to go for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
1 year ago
Hmm, Continuous Availability sounds fancy, but I'm not sure it's the minimal solution required here. I think I'll go with Option B to keep things simple and reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Chery
1 year ago
User 3: I think Option B is the way to go for a simple and reliable deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, deploying vRealize Operations as a cluster with High Availability enabled should meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for minimal resource consumption and resilience.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helaine
1 year ago
I think option B would meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go! High Availability ensures that my vROps deployment can withstand a single node failure. I like the sound of that resilience!
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
1 year ago
Chantay: Absolutely, it's always good to have a backup plan in place. High Availability is key for ensuring our system stays up and running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, having that resilience is crucial for our operations. It's great to know that there's a solution like that available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
User 1: Option B is definitely the best choice. High Availability will keep our vROps deployment running smoothly even if a node fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel