Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 2V0-21.23 Exam - Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

A vSphere cluster has the following vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) group configuration:* Virtual machine (VM) group named DB* Host groups named PROD11 and PROD55The administrator wants to force the VMs in the DB group to run on the hosts in the PROD11 group. However, if all the hosts in PROD55.Which VM/Host rule must the administrator create to ensure that these requirements are met?
A) A preferential rule between the DB group and PROD11 group
B) A preferential rule between the DB group and the PROD55 group
C) A preferential rule between the DB group and the PROD55 group
D) A required rule between the DB group and the PROD11 group

VMware 2V0-21.23 Exam - Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-21.23 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 1
[All 2V0-21.23 Questions]

A vSphere cluster has the following vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) group configuration:

* Virtual machine (VM) group named DB

* Host groups named PROD11 and PROD55

The administrator wants to force the VMs in the DB group to run on the hosts in the PROD11 group. However, if all the hosts in PROD55.

Which VM/Host rule must the administrator create to ensure that these requirements are met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Option A is correct because it allows the administrator to create a preferential rule between the DB group and PROD11 group, which will force the VMs in the DB group to run on the hosts in the PROD11 group if possible, but will allow them to run on the hosts in PROD55 group if necessary. Option B is incorrect because it will create a preferential rule between the DB group and PROD55 group, which will force the VMs in the DB group to run on the hosts in PROD55 group if possible, which is not what the administrator wants. Option C is incorrect because it is the same as option B. Option D is incorrect because it will create a required rule between the DB group and PROD11 group, which will force the VMs in the DB group to run only on the hosts in PROD11 group and not allow them to run on the hosts in PROD55 group if needed. Reference: https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/7.0/com.vmware.vsphere.resmgmt.doc/GUID-60077B40-66FF-4625-934A-641703ED7601.html


by Scarlet at May 30, 2023, 08:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-21.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Catarina
10 months ago
Not sure about that, what if PROD55 has more resources?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
10 months ago
Surprised this is even a question, it's pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
11 months ago
No way, it has to be required for PROD11!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
11 months ago
I think a preferential rule would work too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
11 months ago
Definitely need a required rule for DB and PROD11.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between required and preferential rules. I think I might lean towards option D, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
11 months ago
If PROD55 is down, the VMs should still run on PROD11, so I feel like a required rule is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to prioritize VMs on specific hosts. I think a preferential rule might not enforce it strictly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
12 months ago
I think we need a required rule for the DB group and PROD11, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good strategy here. Definitely want to leverage the built-in Salesforce features like picklists and validation rules. And the Apex option could be useful for more complex validations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
12 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the sequence of UPDATE statements and the potential for lock contention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Google has a lot of cloud services, but I'm not totally familiar with the differences between them. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel