New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 4 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.25 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 4
[All 2V0-13.25 Questions]

An architect is responsible for designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based solution for a customer. The customer has the following requirement:

* There should be no single points of failure within the solution.

To comply with the customer requirement, the architect has decided to include physical NIC teaming for all ESX servers in the design.

When documenting this design decision, which consideration should the architect make?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 and 9.0.2 Design Guides emphasize that NIC teaming is a critical design element for fault tolerance and redundancy. To avoid a single point of failure at the physical layer, VMware prescribes that:

''Each traffic type is spread across separate network cards to avoid single point of failure.''

This ensures that in case one physical NIC card or PCI slot fails, the traffic can continue to flow through another NIC on a separate card, maintaining network connectivity and host resilience. This guidance is part of Physical NIC Level Redundancy (NLR) design considerations, ensuring that no single physical adapter failure disrupts the ESXi host or associated management, vMotion, or vSAN traffic.

The VCF distributed switch and NSX overlay networks benefit from independent uplinks across NIC cards, providing enhanced resiliency for management and workload domains. VMware recommends Active/Active or Active/Standby teaming using policies such as ''Route based on physical NIC load'' across multiple NIC cards.

Reference (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide -- ''Physical NIC Level Redundancy (NLR)''

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Design Guide -- ''Basic NIC Teaming and Redundancy Considerations''

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 -- ''vSphere Distributed Switch Design Recommendations for NLR.''


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Amber
4 days ago
I think we practiced a question about redundancy in networking, and it mentioned that the architect should consider the failover policies for the NICs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
10 days ago
I remember we discussed the importance of load balancing in NIC teaming, but I'm not entirely sure how it applies to VCF specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
15 days ago
Hmm, NIC teaming seems like a solid solution, but I'm not totally sure what other factors the architect should document when justifying this approach. Might need to do some quick research to make sure I'm covering all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
20 days ago
Whew, this is an important design decision. I'd want to double-check that the NIC teaming aligns with the customer's specific network topology and infrastructure requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
25 days ago
Physical NIC teaming, got it. I'd also want to make sure the uplink ports are properly configured and load-balanced to maximize throughput and resilience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 month ago
Okay, so the key is to avoid any single points of failure. Physical NIC teaming sounds like a good approach, but I wonder if there are any other considerations the architect should keep in mind?
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
1 month ago
Hmm, this one seems straightforward. I'd focus on ensuring the physical NIC teaming is properly configured to provide redundancy and high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel