New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 2 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.25 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 2
[All 2V0-13.25 Questions]

During a design workshop, the security team provides the following requirement for the VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Automation deployment:

All Virtual Machine images must be reviewed and vetted by the security team prior to consumption.

Which Content Library type supports the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A Provider-managed Content Library is curated and controlled centrally by the VCF administrator or provider. It enables vetting and version control over VM templates and OVFs, ensuring compliance with organizational policies, including security reviews. This directly supports the requirement that all images must be reviewed and approved before being used in deployments.


VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Planning and Preparation Guide -- Content Library Management

VMware Aria Automation Content Management Best Practices

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Zoila
3 months ago
B) Tenant-managed could work too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
3 months ago
Totally agree, that makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
3 months ago
I’m surprised they want all images vetted. Sounds like a bottleneck!
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if the tenant needs more control?
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
3 months ago
I think it's D) Provider-managed Content Library.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
4 months ago
I recall a practice question where the Subscribed Content Library was mentioned, but I don't think it fits this requirement about security review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
4 months ago
I feel like we discussed Local Content Libraries in class, but they seem more suited for individual use rather than security vetting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Tenant-managed Content Libraries being more flexible for user control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
4 months ago
I think the Provider-managed Content Library might be the right choice since it allows for centralized management and vetting by the security team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
4 months ago
Based on the requirement, I'm leaning towards the Provider-managed Content Library. That way the security team can vet the images before they're made available to users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
5 months ago
The Tenant-managed Content Library seems like it could work, since it gives the security team control over the content. But I'm not sure if that's the exact functionality they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the differences between the Content Library types. I'll need to review the details on each one to determine which one meets the security requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 months ago
I think the Subscribed Content Library option might be the best fit here, since it allows the security team to review and approve the VM images before they can be used.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel