Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

During an initial design workshop with stakeholders, the architect was provided with an overview of the current state and other information required to proceed to the design phase.The architect has assumed that the solution will need to support high availability for workloads.Given the assumption, which statement should the architect document as a risk?
D) The entire infrastructure is hosted on a single physical site.
A) The solution supports the separation of management components from production workloads.
B) BGP is the dynamic routing protocol on the physical fabric and cannot be changed.
C) The solution supports a recovery point objective (RPO) of 24 hours for infrastructure components.

VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.25 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All 2V0-13.25 Questions]

During an initial design workshop with stakeholders, the architect was provided with an overview of the current state and other information required to proceed to the design phase.

The architect has assumed that the solution will need to support high availability for workloads.

Given the assumption, which statement should the architect document as a risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (Based on VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide):

The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide clearly states that a single-site deployment introduces inherent risks when availability requirements extend beyond single host or rack failures. It specifies:

''A single-site VCF deployment tolerates host, rack, and component failure, but does not provide protection against total site failure. This design profile is not well-suited for disaster recovery or high availability across sites.''

Since the architect assumed that the solution must support high availability for workloads, but the environment is hosted entirely on a single physical site, the solution would not meet this assumption in the event of a site outage. This discrepancy represents a design risk --- a potential event or condition that could prevent the design from fulfilling the availability requirement.

Reference (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide --- VCF Fleet in a Single Site Blueprint and Risk Considerations for HA and DR.

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Architecture Overview --- Availability and Recoverability Design Qualities.


by Walton at Jul 21, 2026, 07:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-13.25 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Doretha
3 days ago
I disagree, BGP is flexible enough for most setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
8 days ago
Wait, 24-hour RPO? That's way too long for critical systems!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
13 days ago
A sounds good, separation is key for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
18 days ago
I think B is a bigger issue, can't change BGP?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
24 days ago
D is definitely a risk, single site means no redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
29 days ago
From practice questions, I recall that separating management from production is usually a good practice, so it might not be a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
1 month ago
I think BGP being unchangeable could be a risk too, but I’m not clear on how that directly impacts high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
1 month ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the RPO of 24 hours could also be a risk if we need more immediate recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 month ago
I remember discussing high availability in class, and I think the risk might be related to hosting everything on a single site. That could be a big issue if there's a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel