During an initial design workshop with stakeholders, the architect was provided with an overview of the current state and other information required to proceed to the design phase.
The architect has assumed that the solution will need to support high availability for workloads.
Given the assumption, which statement should the architect document as a risk?
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (Based on VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide):
The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide clearly states that a single-site deployment introduces inherent risks when availability requirements extend beyond single host or rack failures. It specifies:
''A single-site VCF deployment tolerates host, rack, and component failure, but does not provide protection against total site failure. This design profile is not well-suited for disaster recovery or high availability across sites.''
Since the architect assumed that the solution must support high availability for workloads, but the environment is hosted entirely on a single physical site, the solution would not meet this assumption in the event of a site outage. This discrepancy represents a design risk --- a potential event or condition that could prevent the design from fulfilling the availability requirement.
Reference (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide --- VCF Fleet in a Single Site Blueprint and Risk Considerations for HA and DR.
VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Architecture Overview --- Availability and Recoverability Design Qualities.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!