VMware 2V0-13.25 Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.25 exam

Question #: 6
Topic #: 1

An architect is designing a private cloud infrastructure for two departments (HR and Finance) based on VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) and has been given the following requirements:

HR and Finance superusers require access to VCF Operations.

VCF Operations access, monitoring, and logging information must not be shared across departments.

Which design decision would meet the requirement?

ADeploy two VCF Fleet instances within the private cloud, one for HR and one for Finance.

BConfigure two tenant instances within VCF Operations, one for HR and one for Finance.

CDeploy two VCF Operations instances within a VCF Fleet, one for HR and one for Finance.

DConfigure two sets of scopes and index partitions within VCF Operations, one for HR and one for Finance.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

To enforce strict separation of monitoring data, logs, and access control, deploying two separate VCF Operations instances is the recommended solution. This ensures that each department (HR and Finance) has a completely isolated monitoring stack, including dashboards, alerts, log retention, and user roles.

Although scopes and index partitions can provide some level of logical segregation within a single instance, they do not guarantee complete security isolation, especially in environments with strict compliance or multi-tenancy concerns. Deploying two separate instances ensures compliance with data isolation and privacy requirements, making it the most secure and compliant option.

VMware Aria Operations Deployment Guide for Multi-Tenancy and Isolation

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Logical Design Guide -- Operations Segmentation Models

by Pansy at Nov 21, 2025, 02:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 2V0-13.25 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carlton

17 days ago

I prefer B as well. It’s straightforward and meets the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

23 days ago

D sounds complicated. Scopes and partitions can be tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanford

28 days ago

Option C could work too, but it might be overkill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

1 month ago

I agree, B keeps things organized and secure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

1 month ago

I’m not sure about D, seems overly complicated for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamonica

2 months ago

Definitely need to keep those operations separate, option A is solid.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

2 months ago

Surprised that they need separate instances for such similar functions!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathryn

2 months ago

I disagree, I think option C would provide better isolation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

2 months ago

Haha, I bet the architect is just wishing they could deploy a cloud for each employee at this point!

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

3 months ago

C is the one for me. Gotta love that dedicated VCF Operations instance for each department.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isadora

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards D. Seems like the most elegant solution to keep those departments separate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Son

3 months ago

Option B is the way to go. Keeps things nice and tidy for the HR and Finance folks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ammie

3 months ago

I’m leaning towards option C since it specifies deploying separate instances, but I’m a bit confused about the differences between instances and tenant configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecily

3 months ago

I recall a practice question about isolating resources, and I think using scopes and index partitions could work, so option D might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roy

3 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like deploying two separate VCF Operations instances could be overkill. Maybe option A or C is better?

upvoted 0 times

...

Amos

4 months ago

I feel pretty confident that option B is the right answer here. Keeping the tenant instances separate is a clean and straightforward way to meet the requirements without over-complicating the infrastructure. I'll make sure to double-check, but I think I'll go with B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hester

4 months ago

Option D sounds interesting, configuring two sets of scopes and index partitions within VCF Operations. That could be a clever way to isolate the data without needing to deploy additional instances. I'll make sure to read through the details of that choice carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

4 months ago

I think option B sounds familiar because it mentions tenant instances, which I remember from our discussions on multi-tenancy in VCF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

4 months ago

Option B seems like the best choice for tenant separation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rhea

4 months ago

I think option B is the best choice. Separate tenant instances make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

5 months ago

Option A is the clear winner here. Two VCF Fleet instances, easy peasy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

5 months ago

I feel like A is too much infrastructure for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements mention keeping the VCF Operations access, monitoring, and logging separate, but I'm not sure if deploying two VCF Fleet instances (option A) or two VCF Operations instances (option C) would be overkill. I'll have to think this through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenora

5 months ago

I think option B is the way to go here. Configuring two tenant instances within VCF Operations seems like the most straightforward way to keep the access, monitoring, and logging separate between the two departments.

upvoted 0 times