VMware Exam 2V0-13.24 Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.24 exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 2

An architect is working with an organization on the creation of a new Private Cloud Platform. The organization has provided the following business objectives they wish to achieve with the new platform:

* Reduce the operating costs associated with running separate areas of hosting capacity and separate/duplicate systems.

* Reduce the risks, time, and effort associated with managing platforms that are out of vendor support.

* Reduce the operating costs associated with Public Cloud usage.

* Reduce the risks associated with having incomplete documentation for application inventory and dependency mappings.

They have grouped these business objectives into a set of use cases:

* Migration - Provide a platform that supports the migration of virtualized workloads from existing platforms.

* Containerization - Provide a platform that supports the deployment of containerized workloads.

* Centralization and Consolidation - Provide a central private cloud platform accessible to all relevant areas of the business.

When considering these objectives and use cases, what should the architect include in the design documentation as a part of the Conceptual Model?

AAn assumption that the new platform will co-exist with the existing platforms for a period of time to allow workloads to be migrated in a phased approach

BA risk that the existing platforms are running Linux Operating Systems that are out of vendor support

CAn assumption that a complete mapping of application dependencies is not available

DA requirement that the solution will provide the capability to migrate Kubernetes-based workloads from the Public Cloud

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The Conceptual Model in VCF outlines high-level assumptions and approaches to meet objectives. Option A, assuming 'co-existence with existing platforms for phased migration,' directly supports the Migration and Consolidation use cases, aligning with cost reduction and risk mitigation by enabling a controlled transition to the new VCF platform (e.g., using vMotion or HCX). Option B (Linux risk) is specific and unstated. Option C (dependency mapping) is a risk, not an assumption driving design. Option D (Kubernetes requirement) adds specificity beyond the stated objectives. A is foundational to VCF migration strategies.

by Cammy at Aug 04, 2025, 09:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

3 months ago

Option A sounds like a good approach to me. Migrating workloads in a phased manner while co-existing with existing platforms seems like a reasonable assumption to make.

upvoted 0 times

Junita

2 months ago

User 1: Option A sounds like a good approach. It allows for a smooth transition of workloads.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmela

3 months ago

I think the architect should include option A in the design documentation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolene

3 months ago

I think option C is the correct answer. The business objectives clearly state that there is a risk of incomplete documentation for application inventory and dependency mappings, so this should be included in the Conceptual Model.

upvoted 0 times

Karrie

1 months ago

Option C is a good choice. It aligns with the objective of having complete documentation for application inventory and dependency mappings.

upvoted 0 times

...