Discuss VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Topic 2 Question 13

An architect is working with an organization on the creation of a new Private Cloud Platform. The organization has provided the following business objectives they wish to achieve with the new platform:

* Reduce the operating costs associated with running separate areas of hosting capacity and separate/duplicate systems.

* Reduce the risks, time, and effort associated with managing platforms that are out of vendor support.

* Reduce the operating costs associated with Public Cloud usage.

* Reduce the risks associated with having incomplete documentation for application inventory and dependency mappings.

They have grouped these business objectives into a set of use cases:

* Migration - Provide a platform that supports the migration of virtualized workloads from existing platforms.

* Containerization - Provide a platform that supports the deployment of containerized workloads.

* Centralization and Consolidation - Provide a central private cloud platform accessible to all relevant areas of the business.

When considering these objectives and use cases, what should the architect include in the design documentation as a part of the Conceptual Model?

AAn assumption that the new platform will co-exist with the existing platforms for a period of time to allow workloads to be migrated in a phased approach

BA risk that the existing platforms are running Linux Operating Systems that are out of vendor support

CAn assumption that a complete mapping of application dependencies is not available

DA requirement that the solution will provide the capability to migrate Kubernetes-based workloads from the Public Cloud

Suggested Answer: A

The Conceptual Model in VCF outlines high-level assumptions and approaches to meet objectives. Option A, assuming 'co-existence with existing platforms for phased migration,' directly supports the Migration and Consolidation use cases, aligning with cost reduction and risk mitigation by enabling a controlled transition to the new VCF platform (e.g., using vMotion or HCX). Option B (Linux risk) is specific and unstated. Option C (dependency mapping) is a risk, not an assumption driving design. Option D (Kubernetes requirement) adds specificity beyond the stated objectives. A is foundational to VCF migration strategies.

Get Premium 2V0-13.24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

20 comments · newest first

Stephaine 10 months ago

Isn't it a bit optimistic to think the new platform will coexist smoothly?

Delisa 10 months ago

I disagree, we should focus on the migration capabilities first.

Hui 10 months ago

Sounds like a solid plan to reduce costs!

Cheryl 11 months ago

Wait, are we really assuming no mapping exists? That seems risky.

Talia 11 months ago

I think option C is a must-have.

Francesco 11 months ago

I vaguely recall something about migration requirements, but I'm not sure if focusing on Kubernetes workloads specifically is necessary for this question.

Bulah 11 months ago

I feel like the assumption about incomplete application dependency mappings is also important. We talked about how that could lead to issues down the line.

Kaitlyn 11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think the risk of existing platforms being out of vendor support is crucial to mention. It could impact the overall strategy.

Dulce 12 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of assumptions in design documentation, especially about co-existing platforms during migration. That seems relevant here.

Tijuana 12 months ago

The requirement to support Kubernetes-based workload migration from the public cloud is an interesting one. I'll need to make sure that's reflected in the conceptual model as well.

Kaycee 1 year ago

The question mentions risks around out-of-support Linux platforms and incomplete application dependency mapping. I'll make sure to include those as part of the conceptual model.

Angelyn 1 year ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The conceptual model should include an assumption about the phased migration approach to allow co-existence with existing platforms. That aligns with the "Migration" use case.

Eliseo 1 year ago

Hmm, the question is asking about the conceptual model, but the use cases cover a wide range of requirements. I'll need to carefully analyze each one and determine the relevant conceptual model components.

Mozell 1 year ago

This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key business objectives and use cases to identify the appropriate conceptual model elements.

Iluminada 1 year ago

I agree with Carmela, having a phased approach for workload migration is important.

Carlton 1 year ago

Option A sounds like a good approach to me. Migrating workloads in a phased manner while co-existing with existing platforms seems like a reasonable assumption to make.

Junita 1 year ago

↳ replying to Carlton

User 1: Option A sounds like a good approach. It allows for a smooth transition of workloads.

Carmela 1 year ago

I think the architect should include option A in the design documentation.

Jolene 1 year ago

I think option C is the correct answer. The business objectives clearly state that there is a risk of incomplete documentation for application inventory and dependency mappings, so this should be included in the Conceptual Model.

Karrie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Jolene

Option C is a good choice. It aligns with the objective of having complete documentation for application inventory and dependency mappings.

VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam - Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion