New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 1V0-21.20 Exam - Topic 6 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 1V0-21.20 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 6
[All 1V0-21.20 Questions]

An administrator wants to ensure that a copy of a virtual machine can

still power up on another data center during a disaster.

Which feature meets this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Laurel at Jul 09, 2024, 09:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1V0-21.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rasheeda
3 months ago
High Availability is great, but it won't help in a different data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
3 months ago
Wait, can Fault Tolerance really help with that? I'm not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
Totally agree, vSphere Replication is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
4 months ago
I think vMotion is more about live migrations, not backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
4 months ago
vSphere Replication is the way to go for disaster recovery!
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
4 months ago
Fault Tolerance sounds familiar, but I don’t think it’s meant for disaster recovery across different sites like vSphere Replication is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like vSphere High Availability might not cover the requirement of powering up in another data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember vMotion is more about live migration rather than disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
5 months ago
I think vSphere Replication is the right choice here since it focuses on disaster recovery and allows VMs to be powered on in another location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know vMotion is for live migration, but I'm not sure if that would work for a disaster scenario. I think I'll go with A to be safe, but I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that the question is asking about ensuring a copy of the VM can power up in another data center during a disaster. That means we need a replication or failover feature, so the answer has to be A. vSphere Replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
I think the answer is A. vSphere Replication seems like the feature that would allow a copy of the virtual machine to power up in another data center during a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe B or C could also work, but I'll need to review the details of each feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward security question. I'll start by considering the options and thinking about how they could be used to secure the HTTPS integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
5 months ago
Easy peasy! Option A, CONCAT('abc', 'test', 'drive'), is the way to go. Can't go wrong with the good old CONCAT function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 years ago
Fault Tolerance? That's so last year. These days, it's all about vSphere Replication. Gotta keep that virtual machine safe, even if the whole data center goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 years ago
I'd vote for vSphere Replication. It's like having a backup version of your VM, just waiting to be powered on. Disaster? Bring it on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
2 years ago
vSphere High Availability? Nah, that's just about restarting VMs after a failure. We need something more robust for a true disaster scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
1 year ago
C: I agree, vSphere High Availability is not enough for a true disaster scenario. vSphere Replication is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
B: Yeah, vSphere Replication is the way to go for disaster recovery. It ensures your VM can still run in another location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
2 years ago
A: vSphere Replication is the feature you're looking for. It creates a copy of the VM that can be powered up in another data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
2 years ago
vMotion? Really? That's for live migrations, not disaster recovery! Come on, you gotta think bigger than that.
upvoted 0 times
Roselle
1 year ago
C) vSphere High Availability
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
Definitely. vSphere Replication is the feature that ensures a copy of a virtual machine can power up in another data center during a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 year ago
A) vSphere Replication
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
1 year ago
Yeah, you're right. vMotion is not the right choice for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
1 year ago
D) Fault Tolerance
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
1 year ago
C) vSphere High Availability
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
1 year ago
Luke: Yeah, both vSphere Replication and Fault Tolerance are important for ensuring business continuity during a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
1 year ago
Fault Tolerance would also be a good option for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
1 year ago
B) vMotion
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
2 years ago
A) vSphere Replication
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
2 years ago
Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
2 years ago
Yeah, vSphere Replication is specifically for disaster recovery scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
2 years ago
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
2 years ago
vSphere Replication is the feature you're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
2 years ago
vSphere Replication is the feature you're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phung
2 years ago
I believe vSphere High Availability could also be a good option to ensure the VM can power up in another data center during a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think vMotion could also help move the VM to another data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
2 years ago
I agree with Erick. vSphere Replication creates a copy of the VM for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
2 years ago
Hmm, I'd say Fault Tolerance. That way the VM is always running, no matter what happens. Redundancy is the name of the game!
upvoted 0 times
Thora
2 years ago
But vSphere Replication could also be useful for creating a backup copy in another data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
2 years ago
I agree, Fault Tolerance ensures continuous availability of the VM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
2 years ago
vSphere Replication, of course! Gotta have that disaster recovery, am I right? Keeps the VM alive and kicking even when the main data center is down.
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
2 years ago
True, vSphere High Availability is also important for keeping VMs running during disasters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
2 years ago
C) vSphere High Availability
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
2 years ago
Definitely! vSphere Replication is essential for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 years ago
A) vSphere Replication
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) vSphere Replication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel