New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware 1V0-21.20 Exam - Topic 4 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 1V0-21.20 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 4
[All 1V0-21.20 Questions]

An operator needs to take a snapshot of a VM before an upgrade. The

application team needs the ability to restore the VM with a consistent

state of the guest file system while keeping the VM online.

How can the operator accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Vincenza at Aug 20, 2022, 08:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1V0-21.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elza
4 months ago
C is definitely the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
4 months ago
I thought you had to power off for a snapshot? Surprised to see C works while online!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
4 months ago
Wait, why would you power off the VM? That's not efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
4 months ago
Totally agree, quiescing is essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
4 months ago
Option C is the way to go for a consistent snapshot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options, but I feel like option A is about upgrading compatibility, not taking a snapshot. That doesn’t seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
5 months ago
I think we had a similar question in our last review session, and I chose option C then too. It makes sense to ensure the file system is consistent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option D is wrong since it requires powering off the VM, which wouldn't keep it online.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
5 months ago
I remember we practiced taking snapshots, and I think option C is the right one because it mentions quiescing the guest file system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to review my GitHub knowledge to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Are we supposed to include the number of Chatter files attached to cases and the number of content packs attached to cases as well? I want to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. We need to mitigate those specific threats, so I'm thinking attack surface reduction rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint would be the best option to cover all of those bases.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel