New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 1V0-21.20 Exam - Topic 4 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 1V0-21.20 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 4
[All 1V0-21.20 Questions]

An administrator is trying to configure EVC on a cluster that has both AMD and Intel hosts, but the configuration is failing. What is causing this failure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Darnell
4 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize EVC had so many prerequisites!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
4 months ago
I thought it was C, passthrough devices can cause issues, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
4 months ago
Wait, are you sure it's not B? vMotion is pretty important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
I agree, A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
4 months ago
It's definitely A, you can't mix AMD and Intel without separating them first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
5 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about passthrough devices and EVC. If they're not removed, it could cause issues, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like vMotion configuration might be important too. Did we cover that in class?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
5 months ago
I remember something about needing to separate hosts by processor type for EVC to work properly. I think that's a key step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
5 months ago
I don't recall HA being a requirement for EVC. It seems like it’s more about the CPU compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
5 months ago
The question mentions "two determinations" so I'll need to focus on identifying the two most significant events from the logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
5 months ago
I lean towards "No" because I remember reading something about how forced failovers are generally not permitted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
5 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. The client wants to charge expenditures at a higher level than where the progress is captured. That sounds like it could involve some kind of shared structure relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel