Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Versa Networks VNX301 Exam - Topic 6 Question 8 Discussion

Posted by Clarence on Jun 22, 2026 at 06:58 AM

Examine the exhibit below. You are configuring Class of Service on a WAN-facing network interface, and you want to perform DSCP rewrite on the packets that are forwarded to the WAN. However, you are not able to turn on DSCP rewrite. Referring to the exhibit, what is the cause of this issue?

Suggested Answer: C

In the exhibit, the Add Associate Interface/Network window has Interface selected, and the interface name is set to vni-0/0. The DSCP rewrite option is not available because rewrite behavior is intended to be applied at the network association level for the WAN network, not directly while associating only the physical/logical interface. For WAN-facing CoS, the scheduler and shaping parameters can be attached to an interface, but DSCP rewrite policies are applied to remark traffic as it exits through a network context.

Versa SD-WAN design documentation explains that QoS rewrite rules rewrite packet QoS attributes as packets leave the VOS device, and that rewrite rules can modify IEEE 802.1p bits, IPv4 TOS/DSCP bits, and IPv6 traffic class bits. It also explains that a rewrite policy is commonly applied on a WAN network to remark traffic based on the forwarding class and loss priority assigned by QoS or App QoS policies. In the design example, Versa explicitly describes applying a QoS propagation or rewrite policy on the MPLS WAN network to remark traffic to a DSCP value. Therefore, the issue is the association type: it is set to Interface, not Network.


Get Premium VNX301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
MA
Malika 2 months ago
I'm leaning towards D. No rewrite rules means no DSCP rewrite.
AL
Alecia 2 months ago
I feel like it's A. Shaping needs to be set up first for rewrite.
UN
Una 2 months ago
I think it's B. Scheduler Map and Rewrite can't work together.
HE
Heike 3 months ago
Totally agree with techguy, shaping is key here!
AR
Arlie 3 months ago
D) makes sense too, no rules means no rewrite.
MA
Maile 3 months ago
Wait, is it really C)? That seems odd.
BA
Barney 3 months ago
I think B) is the issue. Can't have both at once!
KI
Kirk 3 months ago
A) Rewrite requires the configuration of shaping on the interface.
FE
Felton 3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because if there are no rewrite rules, then it makes sense that DSCP rewrite wouldn’t work, right? But I’m not completely confident.
SA
Salome 4 months ago
I feel like I read that if the Associate setting is wrong, it could prevent DSCP rewrite from being enabled. That might be worth considering.
RH
Rhea 4 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where the issue was related to the scheduler map conflicting with rewrite settings. Could that be the case here?
CL
Clare 4 months ago
I remember something about needing to configure shaping for DSCP rewrite to work, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel