B and D for sure. Although, I have to admit, the idea of using a service template as a 'post-staging' thing is kind of amusing. Like, 'Oops, forgot to configure this thing. Quick, fire up the service template!'
B and D are the obvious choices here. Although, I have to say, applying a non-identical configuration to multiple CPEs sounds more like a 'custom service' than a 'template'.
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Applying a non-identical service configuration to multiple CPEs doesn't really fit the definition of a 'template', does it? I'd go with B and D.
B and D seem like the most reasonable options here. I can see how a service template could be used to apply the same QoS configuration to multiple CPEs, and to share an identical service configuration across tenants.
Lisandra
1 months agoBettyann
7 days agoKayleigh
10 days agoJerlene
21 days agoVelda
2 months agoKassandra
2 months agoDexter
14 days agoLeah
30 days agoGlen
1 months agoMelvin
2 months agoEttie
10 days agoShonda
11 days agoLashunda
22 days agoYoulanda
2 months agoLea
24 days agoCruz
1 months agoShawn
2 months agoNana
2 months agoDorethea
3 months agoAileen
3 months agoJacquelyne
3 months ago