Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Versa Networks VNX100 Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Versa Networks's VNX100 exam

Question #: 15
Topic #: 1

[All VNX100 Questions]

What are two ways that a service template would be used? (Choose two.)

Aas a post-staging template for multiple CPEs

Bto apply an identical QoS configuration to multiple CPEs

Cto apply a non-identical service configuration to multiple CPEs

Dto share an identical service configuration across tenants

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C, D

by Hillary at Mar 29, 2023, 02:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium VNX100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Leonardo

10 months ago

I disagree with D; it seems too limiting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rochell

10 months ago

A and B are spot on!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

10 months ago

Wait, can you really use a template for non-identical configs? Sounds odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hershel

10 months ago

I think D is also a valid use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

10 months ago

Definitely A and B! Makes total sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verdell

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused about C; it seems off because service templates usually apply identical configurations, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rashida

11 months ago

I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think D might be relevant for sharing configurations across tenants.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B could be correct since QoS settings often need to be consistent across devices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

11 months ago

I think option A sounds familiar, like we discussed using templates for multiple CPEs in class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

11 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should wait for the retrospective or bring it up right away. Maybe I should encourage the team to work together on this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

11 months ago

I think the URL with v1 might be the right one. I remember we focused on versioning in class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettyann

11 months ago

I think classification of risk profiles is a good strategy for organizing and presenting risk information to stakeholders in a clear way. That's the option I'm leaning towards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisandra

1 year ago

B and D for sure. Although, I have to admit, the idea of using a service template as a 'post-staging' thing is kind of amusing. Like, 'Oops, forgot to configure this thing. Quick, fire up the service template!'

upvoted 0 times

Bettyann

1 year ago

Haha, yeah, the 'post-staging' concept does sound funny. But B and D are definitely useful options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

1 year ago

D) to share an identical service configuration across tenants

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerlene

1 year ago

B) to apply an identical QoS configuration to multiple CPEs

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Velda

1 year ago

B and D are the obvious choices here. Although, I have to say, applying a non-identical configuration to multiple CPEs sounds more like a 'custom service' than a 'template'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kassandra

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Applying a non-identical service configuration to multiple CPEs doesn't really fit the definition of a 'template', does it? I'd go with B and D.

upvoted 0 times

Dexter

1 year ago

User 3: Definitely, B and D are the way to go for applying configurations to multiple CPEs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, I think B and D make more sense for using a service template.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glen

1 year ago

User 1: I agree, C doesn't seem like a good fit for a template.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Melvin

1 year ago

I'm going with B and D as well. Using a service template to apply a consistent configuration across multiple devices and tenants makes a lot of sense.

upvoted 0 times

Ettie

1 year ago

Agreed, it's efficient to have that consistency in configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

1 year ago

D) to share an identical service configuration across tenants

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashunda

1 year ago

B) to apply an identical QoS configuration to multiple CPEs

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Youlanda

1 year ago

B and D seem like the most reasonable options here. I can see how a service template could be used to apply the same QoS configuration to multiple CPEs, and to share an identical service configuration across tenants.

upvoted 0 times

Lea

1 year ago

Makes sense to have those options for better control and scalability in network management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cruz

1 year ago

It's a great way to streamline operations and ensure uniformity in service delivery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

1 year ago

Definitely, it helps with consistency and efficiency in managing multiple CPEs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

1 year ago

I agree, using a service template for QoS configuration and sharing across tenants makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Dorethea

1 year ago

I'm not sure about C and D. I think they might be used for different purposes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

1 year ago

I agree with Jacquelyne. Using a service template for post-staging and applying QoS configuration makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

1 year ago

I think A and B are the correct options.

upvoted 0 times

...