B and D for sure. Although, I have to admit, the idea of using a service template as a 'post-staging' thing is kind of amusing. Like, 'Oops, forgot to configure this thing. Quick, fire up the service template!'
B and D are the obvious choices here. Although, I have to say, applying a non-identical configuration to multiple CPEs sounds more like a 'custom service' than a 'template'.
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Applying a non-identical service configuration to multiple CPEs doesn't really fit the definition of a 'template', does it? I'd go with B and D.
B and D seem like the most reasonable options here. I can see how a service template could be used to apply the same QoS configuration to multiple CPEs, and to share an identical service configuration across tenants.
Lisandra
22 days agoVelda
26 days agoKassandra
27 days agoLeah
9 days agoGlen
13 days agoMelvin
1 months agoLashunda
1 days agoYoulanda
2 months agoLea
3 days agoCruz
24 days agoShawn
1 months agoNana
1 months agoDorethea
2 months agoAileen
2 months agoJacquelyne
2 months ago