MENU
It the Backup Administrator has to perform a backup over a high-latency, low bandwidth network link, how can the disruptions to the backup process be avoided?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium VMCE2021 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
ZA
Zachary
10 months ago
B is just overkill, right? One should be enough!
RA
Rana
10 months ago
I disagree, A seems more efficient.
SA
Salley
10 months ago
D could work, but it might not be enough on its own.
LA
Lajuana
11 months ago
Wow, I didn't know WAN accelerators could help that much!
TW
Twana
11 months ago
Option C sounds like the best approach!
MA
Marguerita
11 months ago
Adding more WAN accelerators sounds like it could help, but I wonder if it’s really necessary or just overkill for this scenario.
JA
Jamal
11 months ago
I feel like adjusting compression settings could help, but I’m not entirely confident if that’s the main solution here.
WE
Wenona
11 months ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that making a local backup first could help with the latency issues.
LA
Lacresha
12 months ago
I remember something about WAN accelerators being useful for improving backup speeds, but I'm not sure if direct backups are the best option in this case.
EL
Elfriede
12 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is a job for WAN accelerators. The key is to optimize the backup process for the network conditions.
DA
Darci
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy. I think making a local backup and then using WAN accelerators for the copy job is the way to go here.
MA
Maxima
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review the options and see which one best addresses the high-latency, low-bandwidth network.
EL
Elmer
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the network constraints and how to minimize disruptions.
BE
Beatriz
1 year ago
Option B is like trying to solve world hunger by just handing out more plates. Gotta think a little smarter than that, folks.
MI
Mica
1 year ago
Haha, imagine if they just added more WAN accelerators to the target site. That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet by building a bigger sink!
PE
Pearlie
1 year ago
I like the idea of a direct backup using a WAN accelerator in A, but it might be overkill for just avoiding disruptions. C or D seem more practical and cost-effective.
KI
Kimberlie
1 year ago
C seems like a smart choice for budget.
MA
Margo
1 year ago
Combining C and D might be the best strategy.
MA
Mariann
1 year ago
D could really help with efficiency too, though.
RE
Reena
1 year ago
D is a good option too. Adjusting the compression and deduplication settings could really help optimize the backup process over the low-bandwidth link.
EM
Emilio
1 year ago
D) By adjusting the compression and deduplication settings for this Job.
DE
Deja
1 year ago
C) By making a backup locally and utilizing WAN accelerators for a backup copy Job.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
A) By making a direct backup using WAN accelerator.
RU
Rutha
1 year ago
I think D) By adjusting the compression and deduplication settings for this Job could also help avoid disruptions.
GR
Graciela
1 year ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Making a local backup and then using WAN accelerators to transfer the copy is a smart approach to avoid disruptions on the slow network.
WI
Wilson
1 year ago
C) By making a backup locally and utilizing WAN accelerators for a backup copy Job.
EL
Elfriede
1 year ago
B) By adding additional WAN accelerators to the target site.
MO
Monte
1 year ago
A) By making a direct backup using WAN accelerator.
TR
Tracie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) By making a backup locally and utilizing WAN accelerators for a backup copy Job.
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) By making a direct backup using WAN accelerator.