Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VEEAM VMCE2021 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for VEEAM's VMCE2021 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All VMCE2021 Questions]

A Veeam administrator has been tasked to create a backup that will automatically make a copy of data on a different media type, while also being off site, without creating additional backup or backup copy jobs. The administrator has determined that a Scale-out Backup Repository can be used as part of the solution. How can this be accomplished?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/backup/vsphere/capacity_tier_copy.html?ver=120


by Laurel at Jul 05, 2024, 07:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium VMCE2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Herminia
5 months ago
A is correct, I've used it before!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
5 months ago
B seems interesting, but not sure if it fits the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
5 months ago
Wait, can you really do that with just one job? Sounds too easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
5 months ago
I think D is the better choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
6 months ago
Definitely A, that's the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
6 months ago
I vaguely remember that the capacity tier is important, but I’m confused about whether to enable 'Move' or 'Copy' for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I can't recall if the 'Copy' option is actually necessary for offsite backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
6 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the archive tier might be the key, especially with GFS Tiering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
6 months ago
I remember something about the capacity tier and how it can help with offsite backups, but I'm not sure if 'Move' or 'Copy' is the right option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
6 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'd go with option C - add an archive tier and enable the 'Copy' option. That should accomplish the same thing as option B, but it might be a bit more flexible in terms of the target media type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The answer is B - add an archive tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable 'GFS Tiering'. That way, the data will automatically be copied to a different media type (like tape or cloud) and stored off-site, without needing to create a separate backup or backup copy job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. What exactly is the difference between a "capacity tier" and an "archive tier"? I'll need to review those concepts before I can confidently answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky one, but I think I can figure it out. The key is understanding the different tiers in a Scale-out Backup Repository and how they can be used to automatically copy data to a different media type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
7 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the right answer here. Adjusting the expedited-forwarding BA classifier on the ge-0/0/0 interface should help increase the transmit rate and resolve the video quality issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
7 months ago
I think one of the true statements might be about scheduling backup tasks, but I'm not completely sure if it's only for daily or weekly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
7 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The question is asking about when a brand extension negatively impacts the core brand's attributes. I think the answer is A, brand dilution. Gotta be careful with those tricky brand extension questions though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
2 years ago
I vote for option E: Hire a carrier pigeon to manually deliver the backups to the offsite location. Old-school, but it gets the job done!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B, but I'd have to double-check the Veeam documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Odelia
2 years ago
After reviewing the documentation, it looks like the correct option is actually A. We need to add a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Move' option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
2 years ago
I agree, 'GFS Tiering' does sound like it would accomplish the task of making a copy of the data on a different media type. Let's double-check the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 years ago
I think B is the correct option. It mentions enabling 'GFS Tiering' which sounds like it would create a copy of the data on a different media type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
2 years ago
D is my pick. Copying to a capacity tier is probably the easiest solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Azzie
2 years ago
That's a good point, but I still think D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think adding an archive tier with the 'Copy' option could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
2 years ago
I agree, copying to a capacity tier seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 years ago
I think D is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rocco
2 years ago
I think both options could work, but enabling 'GFS Tiering' in an archive tier might provide better long-term storage capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 years ago
But wouldn't enabling the 'Move' option in a capacity tier also achieve the same result?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Add an archive tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable 'GFS Tiering'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Add a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Move' option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
2 years ago
I'd go with C. The 'Copy' option on the archive tier sounds like it would create the offsite backup we need.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
2 years ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It would create a copy of the data on a different media type and keep it off site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
2 years ago
I think C is the way to go. The 'Copy' option on the archive tier should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
2 years ago
Option B seems like the way to go. 'GFS Tiering' on an archive tier should get the job done without any extra work.
upvoted 0 times
Eliz
2 years ago
Definitely, it's a smart way to ensure data is copied to a different media type without much manual effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
2 years ago
Adding an archive tier and enabling 'GFS Tiering' does sound like a simple solution for off-site backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
2 years ago
It definitely seems like the most efficient way to automatically make a copy of data on a different media type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 years ago
I agree, using 'GFS Tiering' on an archive tier sounds like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
2 years ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to achieve the task without creating extra jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
2 years ago
Option B does sound like the best choice. 'GFS Tiering' should handle the off-site copy automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel