MENU
A Veeam administrator has been tasked to create a backup that will automatically make a copy of data on a different media type, while also being off site, without creating additional backup or backup copy jobs. The administrator has determined that a Scale-out Backup Repository can be used as part of the solution. How can this be accomplished?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium VMCE2021 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/backup/vsphere/capacity_tier_copy.html?ver=120
40 comments · newest first
HE
Herminia
11 months ago
A is correct, I've used it before!
AN
Annamae
11 months ago
B seems interesting, but not sure if it fits the requirement.
JU
Julene
11 months ago
Wait, can you really do that with just one job? Sounds too easy.
MA
Marlon
11 months ago
I think D is the better choice here.
TO
Tomoko
12 months ago
Definitely A, that's the way to go!
DA
Dawne
12 months ago
I vaguely remember that the capacity tier is important, but I’m confused about whether to enable 'Move' or 'Copy' for this scenario.
LO
Loise
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I can't recall if the 'Copy' option is actually necessary for offsite backups.
GE
Germaine
1 year ago
I think I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the archive tier might be the key, especially with GFS Tiering.
DE
Dewitt
1 year ago
I remember something about the capacity tier and how it can help with offsite backups, but I'm not sure if 'Move' or 'Copy' is the right option here.
MO
Mose
1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'd go with option C - add an archive tier and enable the 'Copy' option. That should accomplish the same thing as option B, but it might be a bit more flexible in terms of the target media type.
GL
Glendora
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The answer is B - add an archive tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable 'GFS Tiering'. That way, the data will automatically be copied to a different media type (like tape or cloud) and stored off-site, without needing to create a separate backup or backup copy job.
RA
Raymon
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. What exactly is the difference between a "capacity tier" and an "archive tier"? I'll need to review those concepts before I can confidently answer this.
MA
Maryrose
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one, but I think I can figure it out. The key is understanding the different tiers in a Scale-out Backup Repository and how they can be used to automatically copy data to a different media type.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the right answer here. Adjusting the expedited-forwarding BA classifier on the ge-0/0/0 interface should help increase the transmit rate and resolve the video quality issue.
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
I think one of the true statements might be about scheduling backup tasks, but I'm not completely sure if it's only for daily or weekly.
PO
Portia
1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. The question is asking about when a brand extension negatively impacts the core brand's attributes. I think the answer is A, brand dilution. Gotta be careful with those tricky brand extension questions though.
OM
Omer
2 years ago
I vote for option E: Hire a carrier pigeon to manually deliver the backups to the offsite location. Old-school, but it gets the job done!
BA
Barrett
2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B, but I'd have to double-check the Veeam documentation to be sure.
OD
Odelia
2 years ago
After reviewing the documentation, it looks like the correct option is actually A. We need to add a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Move' option.
PA
Paulene
2 years ago
I agree, 'GFS Tiering' does sound like it would accomplish the task of making a copy of the data on a different media type. Let's double-check the documentation to be sure.
ST
Stephaine
2 years ago
I think B is the correct option. It mentions enabling 'GFS Tiering' which sounds like it would create a copy of the data on a different media type.
GL
Glenna
2 years ago
D is my pick. Copying to a capacity tier is probably the easiest solution here.
AZ
Azzie
2 years ago
That's a good point, but I still think D is the way to go.
ID
Idella
2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think adding an archive tier with the 'Copy' option could also work.
LI
Lisandra
2 years ago
I agree, copying to a capacity tier seems like the most straightforward solution.
GA
Garry
2 years ago
I think D is the best option.
RO
Rocco
2 years ago
I think both options could work, but enabling 'GFS Tiering' in an archive tier might provide better long-term storage capabilities.
WI
Willard
2 years ago
But wouldn't enabling the 'Move' option in a capacity tier also achieve the same result?
FA
Fausto
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Add an archive tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable 'GFS Tiering'.
WI
Willard
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Add a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Move' option.
ZE
Zena
2 years ago
I'd go with C. The 'Copy' option on the archive tier sounds like it would create the offsite backup we need.
MA
Mari
2 years ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It would create a copy of the data on a different media type and keep it off site.
GE
Georgiana
2 years ago
I think C is the way to go. The 'Copy' option on the archive tier should do the trick.
CA
Carey
2 years ago
Option B seems like the way to go. 'GFS Tiering' on an archive tier should get the job done without any extra work.
EL
Eliz
2 years ago
Definitely, it's a smart way to ensure data is copied to a different media type without much manual effort.
VA
Van
2 years ago
Adding an archive tier and enabling 'GFS Tiering' does sound like a simple solution for off-site backups.
EL
Elizabeth
2 years ago
It definitely seems like the most efficient way to automatically make a copy of data on a different media type.
RO
Rolande
2 years ago
I agree, using 'GFS Tiering' on an archive tier sounds like the best option.
EL
Elmira
2 years ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to achieve the task without creating extra jobs.
CH
Chau
2 years ago
Option B does sound like the best choice. 'GFS Tiering' should handle the off-site copy automatically.