MENU
A number of VMs are running as interdependent applications. They need to fail over, one by one, as a group. What method should be used to do this?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium VMCE_v12 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
To ensure VMs running interdependent applications fail over one by one, as a group, the method to use is D: Failover plan. In Veeam Backup & Replication, a failover plan allows for the orchestration of a group of replicas to fail over in a predefined sequence. This includes the capability to set up delays between starting each VM, which is crucial for interdependent applications that must be started in a specific order to function correctly. The failover plan ensures that dependencies among the group are respected and that the startup sequence follows the correct order, enabling a smooth and organized transition to the failover state.
35 comments · newest first
CH
Charlene
11 months ago
I'm surprised there's so many options for this!
LE
Lettie
11 months ago
Replication plan sounds like it could work too, but not sure.
TU
Tuyet
11 months ago
Wait, isn't Replica failover more efficient for this?
SH
Sharika
11 months ago
Totally agree, it ensures everything transitions smoothly!
TA
Tawna
12 months ago
I think Planned failover is the way to go here.
JU
Junita
12 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think "Replica failover" was mentioned as a method, but I'm not confident it applies here.
AL
Alisha
12 months ago
I feel like "Failover plan" could also be relevant here, but it seems a bit too general for this specific situation.
WH
Whitney
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "Replication plan" being used in similar scenarios. Could that be it?
ED
Edwin
1 year ago
I think the answer might be "Planned failover" since it sounds like it involves a strategy for handling interdependent applications.
AL
Alva
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards the "Planned failover" option, but I want to double-check my understanding of the other choices just to be sure.
NI
Nida
1 year ago
Okay, the key here is that the VMs are interdependent and need to fail over as a group. I think a planned failover approach would be the best way to handle that.
GE
German
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between a replication plan and a failover plan. I'll need to think this through carefully.
KR
Kristeen
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about failover methods. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
MA
Madelyn
2 years ago
Haha, I'm picturing a bunch of VMs playing musical chairs during the failover. Definitely go with C) Planned failover to avoid that chaos!
JU
Junita
2 years ago
Haha, that's a funny image! Definitely C) Planned failover is the best choice.
KR
Kristofer
2 years ago
I agree, C) Planned failover is the way to go to avoid chaos.
LE
Leeann
2 years ago
C) Planned failover, all the way! Gotta love a good plan, especially when everything's riding on it. Failover like a boss!
GA
Gary
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C) Planned failover. Seems like the most organized approach to handle those interdependent VMs. Can't just wing it, am I right?
BE
Bernardine
2 years ago
Exactly, better to be prepared and have a clear strategy.
ED
Edgar
2 years ago
Definitely, you don't want things to go haywire during the failover process.
ST
Stevie
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to have a structured plan in place.
FE
Felix
2 years ago
I agree, having a clear plan for failover is crucial when dealing with interdependent VMs.
AN
Anthony
2 years ago
Planned failover sounds like the way to go. It's important to have a structured plan in place.
EL
Elfrieda
2 years ago
Planned failover sounds like the way to go.
KI
King
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Failover plan could also be a valid option for this scenario.
TA
Tashia
2 years ago
I agree with Patria, because planned failover ensures that the VMs fail over as a group.
EL
Ellsworth
2 years ago
Definitely C) Planned failover. Gotta have that failover plan in place, you know? Don't want any unexpected surprises during the big show!
CH
Chauncey
2 years ago
I think C) Planned failover is the way to go here. You need to coordinate the failover process to make sure everything goes smoothly as a group.
AL
Alethea
2 years ago
We should definitely consider a replication plan for the VMs.
CH
Christiane
2 years ago
A failover plan is essential to ensure a smooth transition.
BA
Barbra
2 years ago
Replica failover might not work well for interdependent applications.
JO
Jodi
2 years ago
I agree, C) Planned failover is the best method for this scenario.
MA
Marti
2 years ago
Yes, with a planned failover, you can control the sequence in which the VMs fail over to avoid any issues.
EM
Emerson
2 years ago
I agree, C) Planned failover is the best option for ensuring all the VMs fail over as a group.
PA
Patria
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Planned failover.