MENU
Should non-design team stakeholders be included in design charrettes?
34 comments · newest first
JA
Jaclyn
10 months ago
They lack design expertise, so I say no.
HA
Haydee
10 months ago
Not sure about that, they might just complicate things.
ZO
Zona
11 months ago
Yes! Their perspective can really shape better designs.
RU
Rupert
11 months ago
Wait, can they really help reduce litigation? Sounds odd.
JE
Jessenia
11 months ago
Definitely agree, community input is crucial!
LO
Louis
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think option B could be right since involving stakeholders might actually prevent future issues.
KA
Karol
11 months ago
I feel like option C might be too dismissive; even if they lack design expertise, their input could still be relevant.
MI
Mila
12 months ago
I think option D makes sense because community concerns are crucial, but I also recall a case where too many voices led to confusion.
CE
Cecily
12 months ago
I remember discussing how including non-design stakeholders can bring valuable perspectives, but I'm not sure if it complicates the process.
AS
Ashanti
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that option A is the way to go. Bringing in non-design stakeholders could open the door to increased legal liability. It's best to keep the design process within the core team.
KA
Kati
1 year ago
I think including non-design stakeholders is a good idea. They can help enhance the team's understanding of community concerns, which is crucial for the design process. I'm leaning towards option D.
YU
Yuette
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. On the one hand, they may not have the design expertise to contribute ideas. But on the other hand, they could provide valuable community insights. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons.
TA
Tammy
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if including non-design stakeholders would increase or decrease legal liability. I'll have to think it through carefully.
TI
Tiffiny
2 years ago
But it may help to reduce future litigation.
LE
Leonardo
2 years ago
I disagree, including them may increase legal liability.
TI
Tiffiny
2 years ago
Because they enhance understanding of community concerns.
DI
Dick
2 years ago
Forget the options, I just hope they serve snacks at these design charrettes. A little sustenance goes a long way in sparking creativity!
VE
Veronica
2 years ago
Annamaria, it's not about aesthetics alone. Stakeholders can help you avoid costly mistakes down the line. D is the right choice.
GR
Gregg
1 year ago
Including non-design team stakeholders can help prevent future legal issues.
DO
Douglass
2 years ago
I think it's important to consider community concerns in the design process.
MI
Micaela
2 years ago
I agree, involving stakeholders can provide valuable insights.
AN
Annamaria
2 years ago
C'mon, who wants a bunch of non-designers ruining the aesthetic? Option C is the clear winner here.
PH
Phil
2 years ago
Why do you think so, Tiffiny?
LU
Luisa
2 years ago
I agree with Stevie. Excluding stakeholders is a recipe for disaster. They bring valuable insights to the table.
JA
Janine
2 years ago
D) Yes, because they enhance understanding of community concerns
TH
Thaddeus
2 years ago
B) Yes, because it may help to reduce future litigation
EM
Emily
2 years ago
A) No, because it may increase legal liability
ST
Stevie
2 years ago
Option D is the way to go. You can't design a project without understanding the community's needs.
BE
Benton
2 years ago
B) Yes, because it may help to reduce future litigation
VA
Val
2 years ago
A) No, because it may increase legal liability
CA
Carin
2 years ago
D) Yes, because they enhance understanding of community concerns
DA
Darrel
2 years ago
Exactly, involving stakeholders in the design process can lead to better outcomes
LA
Lavonda
2 years ago
D) Yes, because they enhance understanding of community concerns
TI
Tiffiny
2 years ago
I think non-design team stakeholders should be included in design charrettes.