New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

US Green Building Council LEED-AP-O+M Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for US Green Building Council's LEED-AP-O+M exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 2
[All LEED-AP-O+M Questions]

What is the maximum distance food or beverage raw materials can be harvested and produced in order to achieve the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The maximum distance for food or beverage raw materials to be harvested and produced for achieving the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing, is 100 miles (160 kilometers). This distance supports local economies and reduces the environmental impacts associated with transportation.


For the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing, food or beverage raw materials must be harvested and produced within a maximum distance of 100 miles (160 kilometers) from the project site. This criterion supports local agriculture and reduces the environmental impacts associated with transportation, contributing to a more sustainable supply chain.

Reference: This distance limitation is specified in the LEED AP Operations + Maintenance reference guide, particularly in the section on sustainable purchasing practices. The guide outlines how sourcing locally not only supports local economies but also minimizes carbon emissions related to transportation.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lachelle
3 months ago
100 miles seems excessive for local food!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
3 months ago
I thought it was 75 miles, but I guess I was wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
4 months ago
Wait, is it really only 60 miles? Sounds too short.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
4 months ago
Totally agree, local sourcing is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
4 months ago
It's 60 miles for that credit!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
4 months ago
I thought it was 85 miles, but I keep second-guessing myself. I should have reviewed that section more thoroughly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards 100 miles, but I’m not confident. It seems like a reasonable distance for sourcing local materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think it was 75 miles, but I could be mixing it up with another credit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
5 months ago
I think the limit is around 60 miles, but I’m not completely sure. It feels like I’ve seen that number before in my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Is this asking about the maximum distance or the minimum distance? I need to double-check the wording of the question and the credit requirements to make sure I'm interpreting this correctly. Gotta be careful on these tricky exam questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to find the option that matches the distance requirement for the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing. I'm pretty confident the answer is B, 75 mi. (120 km).
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Materials and Resources Credit has some distance requirements, but I can't recall the exact numbers off the top of my head. I'll have to carefully read through the options to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the maximum distance for raw materials to be harvested and produced. I'll need to review the Materials and Resources Credit details to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
Hey, as long as the materials are fresh and delicious, who cares how far they traveled? I vote for D) 100 mi. (160 km) - the more the merrier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 year ago
The correct answer is definitely A) 60 mi. (97 km). Anything beyond that is just plain greedy, like asking for extra guac at Chipotle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
1 year ago
Ah, the old 'how far is too far' question. I'm going with C) 85 mi. (137 km) - right in the sweet spot!
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. D) 100 mi. (160 km) seems a bit too far, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
1 year ago
I agree, D) 100 mi. (160 km) does seem like a stretch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
1 year ago
C) 85 mi. (137 km) might be pushing it a bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 year ago
I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) is a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
1 year ago
A) 60 mi. (97 km) seems more reasonable to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noelia
1 year ago
I see both points, but I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) strikes a good balance between supporting local economies and reducing transportation emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) 100 mi. (160 km). We should prioritize access to a wider range of local and regional products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) 75 mi. (120 km). That's the distance I learned in my prep course.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
1 year ago
Let's go with B) 75 mi. (120 km) as our final answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
1 year ago
I remember studying that distance too, it must be the correct answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) sounds about right
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
1 year ago
I agree, I also think the answer is B) 75 mi. (120 km)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 60 mi. (97 km). It makes sense to keep the distance short for sustainability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel