US Green Building Council Exam LEED AP ND Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for US Green Building Council's LEED AP ND exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 5

[All LEED AP ND Questions]

Which of the following strategies is a best practice for reducing a project's development footprint?

Aincrease the amount of impervious area on-site

BProvide parking under or within a building structure

CIncrease the number of cul-de-sacs throughout the site

DImplement a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Reducing a project's development footprint is critical for minimizing environmental impact, particularly in terms of land use and site development. Providing parking under or within a building structure is considered a best practice because it reduces the amount of land required for parking, thereby conserving open space and reducing impervious surfaces. This strategy aligns with LEED's goals of minimizing the environmental footprint of development projects. Increasing impervious areas or the number of cul-de-sacs would have the opposite effect, leading to more extensive land disturbance and potential environmental degradation.

by Cyril at Apr 09, 2025, 01:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium LEED AP ND Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Isreal

2 days ago

Cul-de-sacs? Are we building a labyrinth or a construction site? Option C is a dead end in my opinion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alita

4 days ago

Parking under the building? That's thinking outside the box! Option B gets my vote for innovative design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

14 days ago

Who needs trees and greenery when you can just pave the whole site? Option A is the way to go for maximum efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

20 days ago

I was hoping for a more creative solution, but I guess Option D is the safest bet. Maybe we can sneak in a few cul-de-sacs for fun later on.

upvoted 0 times

Fredric

2 days ago

Option D is definitely the way to go for reducing the project's development footprint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matt

25 days ago

I believe implementing a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is also important to minimize environmental impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Temeka

25 days ago

I agree with Justine. An effective construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is essential for sustainable development.

upvoted 0 times

Deonna

7 days ago

A) increase the amount of impervious area on-site

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

1 months ago

Option D seems like the most logical choice. Erosion and sedimentation control is crucial for reducing the project's footprint.

upvoted 0 times

Celestine

8 days ago

I agree, implementing a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is definitely a best practice for reducing the development footprint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

11 days ago

Option D seems like the most logical choice. Erosion and sedimentation control is crucial for reducing the project's footprint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rashad

1 months ago

I agree with Cammy. It helps reduce the project's development footprint by utilizing space efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

1 months ago

I think the best practice is to provide parking under or within a building structure.

upvoted 0 times

...