Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

US Green Building Council Exam LEED AP ND Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for US Green Building Council's LEED AP ND exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 5
[All LEED AP ND Questions]

Which of the following strategies is a best practice for reducing a project's development footprint?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Reducing a project's development footprint is critical for minimizing environmental impact, particularly in terms of land use and site development. Providing parking under or within a building structure is considered a best practice because it reduces the amount of land required for parking, thereby conserving open space and reducing impervious surfaces. This strategy aligns with LEED's goals of minimizing the environmental footprint of development projects. Increasing impervious areas or the number of cul-de-sacs would have the opposite effect, leading to more extensive land disturbance and potential environmental degradation.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Isreal
3 months ago
Cul-de-sacs? Are we building a labyrinth or a construction site? Option C is a dead end in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
3 months ago
Parking under the building? That's thinking outside the box! Option B gets my vote for innovative design.
upvoted 0 times
Mattie
2 months ago
Parking under the building is definitely a unique approach. Option B is a winner in my book.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. It's a smart way to reduce the project's development footprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
2 months ago
I agree, parking under the building is a great idea. It saves space and looks modern.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
3 months ago
Who needs trees and greenery when you can just pave the whole site? Option A is the way to go for maximum efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
Truman
2 months ago
D) Implement a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
3 months ago
Who needs trees and greenery when you can just pave the whole site?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
3 months ago
A) increase the amount of impervious area on-site
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
4 months ago
I was hoping for a more creative solution, but I guess Option D is the safest bet. Maybe we can sneak in a few cul-de-sacs for fun later on.
upvoted 0 times
Cathern
3 months ago
We can always add some cul-de-sacs for fun later, but let's focus on the best practices first.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
3 months ago
Yeah, implementing a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
3 months ago
Option D is definitely the way to go for reducing the project's development footprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matt
4 months ago
I believe implementing a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is also important to minimize environmental impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
4 months ago
I agree with Justine. An effective construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is essential for sustainable development.
upvoted 0 times
Selma
2 months ago
I agree, a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is crucial
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
D) Implement a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
B) Provide parking under or within a building structure
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
A) increase the amount of impervious area on-site
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
2 months ago
I agree, having parking under or within a building structure can help reduce the project's development footprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
2 months ago
D) Implement a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
3 months ago
B) Provide parking under or within a building structure
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
3 months ago
A) increase the amount of impervious area on-site
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
4 months ago
Option D seems like the most logical choice. Erosion and sedimentation control is crucial for reducing the project's footprint.
upvoted 0 times
Celestine
3 months ago
I agree, implementing a construction erosion and sedimentation control plan is definitely a best practice for reducing the development footprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
3 months ago
Option D seems like the most logical choice. Erosion and sedimentation control is crucial for reducing the project's footprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rashad
4 months ago
I agree with Cammy. It helps reduce the project's development footprint by utilizing space efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
4 months ago
I think the best practice is to provide parking under or within a building structure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel