Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

UiPath Exam UiPath-SAIv1 Topic 11 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-SAIv1 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 11
[All UiPath-SAIv1 Questions]

For an analytics use case, what are the recommended minimum model performance requirements in UiPath Communications Mining?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leandro at Apr 08, 2025, 06:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium UiPath-SAIv1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alayna
2 months ago
I dunno, this question seems a bit... snooty. Do we really need Excellent everything? Good enough should be good enough, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Ira
21 days ago
I think aiming for 'Excellent' in both model ratings and individual performance factors would ensure the best results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
25 days ago
I agree, 'Good' should be sufficient for our analytics use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
1 months ago
I think we should aim for 'Good' or better model ratings and individual performance factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nana
2 months ago
D all the way! Gotta have that Excellent model rating and individual performance factors. Anything less is just not good enough.
upvoted 0 times
Sherron
1 months ago
User 3: D all the way! We need top-notch performance for our analytics use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, we can't settle for anything less than Excellent in both model rating and individual performance factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, D is the way to go. We need that Excellent rating.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
3 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. Excellent individual performance factors are probably the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
2 months ago
B could work too, but D offers the highest level of performance with excellent ratings across the board.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
2 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most reliable choice for meeting the minimum model performance requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
2 months ago
I think D is the best option. Excellent model ratings and individual performance factors are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jolene
3 months ago
Option C looks good to me. Gotta go for that Excellent model rating!
upvoted 0 times
Margret
20 days ago
Let's make sure to focus on achieving an Excellent model rating and good individual performance factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
21 days ago
I think Option C is the way to go for the recommended minimum model performance requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
23 days ago
Yeah, having individual performance factors rated as Good or better is important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
24 days ago
I agree, aiming for an Excellent model rating is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
25 days ago
Let's aim for excellence in both the model rating and individual performance factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
26 days ago
Definitely, we want to make sure the model is performing well overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
30 days ago
I think having individual performance factors rated as 'Good' or better is important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
2 months ago
I agree, aiming for an Excellent model rating is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenny
3 months ago
But wouldn't having both model ratings and individual performance factors rated as 'Excellent' be the best option for an analytics use case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the model ratings should be 'Excellent' and individual performance factors rated as 'Good' or better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
4 months ago
I think the recommended minimum model performance requirements should be Model Ratings of 'Good' or better and individual performance factors rated as 'Good' or better.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel