MENU
What will be the outcome when executing a Try Catch activity with a sequence placed within the Try section and no Catches section present?
25 comments · newest first
FR
Franchesca
10 months ago
B doesn't make sense, the workflow can still run unless it throws an error.
IR
Irma
11 months ago
A is definitely not true, exceptions won't be caught without a catch.
LE
Leota
11 months ago
Wait, so no catches means it just fails? That's surprising!
AS
Asuncion
11 months ago
I disagree, I think D is the right answer.
WE
Werner
11 months ago
C is correct, it only terminates on an exception.
AL
Alona
12 months ago
I believe that without a Catch, the sequence will throw a runtime error, but I need to double-check that.
DO
Dortha
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about this one. I feel like the sequence should still execute unless there's a specific error, but I can't recall the details.
FR
Franklyn
12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the execution will only terminate if an exception is thrown in the Try section.
FE
Felicidad
1 year ago
I think if there's no Catch section, the workflow might just stop if an exception occurs, but I'm not entirely sure.
TA
Tayna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. If there's no Catch section, I'm not sure if the workflow would just terminate or if the default exception handling would kick in. I'll need to think about this a bit more.
KA
Karl
1 year ago
I think the key here is understanding how the Try Catch activity works. If there's no Catch section, then any exceptions that occur within the Try section should be caught and handled by the default exception handling mechanism. I'll go with option A.
FE
Fernanda
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. If there's no Catch section, wouldn't that mean the workflow would just terminate if an exception is thrown? I'm not sure about this one.
TY
Tyisha
1 year ago
Okay, let me see... If there's no Catch section, then any exceptions thrown within the Try section should be handled by the default exception handling mechanism. I'll go with option A.
EL
Elenora
1 year ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'll need to think through the logic carefully to determine the outcome.
RO
Rodolfo
1 year ago
Stateful inspection is the way to go. It inspects the full context of network traffic without relying on a proxy server.
LI
Ling
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the settings that can manage user access to the unified access portal.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
Option C seems like the right approach. I remember seeing that setting in the global admin settings when I was configuring the checkout process.
CH
Chantay
2 years ago
I'm not sure about the exact outcome, but I think it might result in a runtime error.
EL
Elvera
2 years ago
I disagree, I think process execution will only terminate if the sequence throws an exception.
RO
Ronnie
2 years ago
I believe that if an exception occurs, a System Exception will be caught by default.
FR
Franklyn
2 years ago
What do you think will happen if we execute a Try Catch activity with a sequence but no Catch section?
AI
Aimee
2 years ago
Exactly, the absence of a Catch section might make it risky.
SU
Suzi
2 years ago
I think not having a Catch section could lead to potential runtime errors.
RO
Royal
2 years ago
So, the workflow will continue executing as long as the sequence doesn't throw an exception.
AI
Aimee
2 years ago
If there's no Catch section, it will catch a System Exception by default.