Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Trend TM1-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

You have just updated the virus-pattern file, the scan engine, and the Server Protect program files in a single deployment action. The virus-pattern file seems to be causing problems and you conclude it is corrupt. How can you fix this problem?
C) You can roll back the virus-pattern file to a previous version, but you must also roll back the scan-engine and the Server Protect program files.
A) You can roll back the virus-pattern file only and retain the updated versions of the scan-engine and program files.
B) You can roll back the virus-pattern file and the scan-engine file, and retain the updated Server Protect program files.
D) You can roll back the virus-pattern file and leave the updated version of the scan engine, but the program files will automatically roll back to the previous version.

Trend TM1-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Trend's TM1-101 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 2
[All TM1-101 Questions]

You have just updated the virus-pattern file, the scan engine, and the Server Protect program files in a single deployment action. The virus-pattern file seems to be causing problems and you conclude it is corrupt. How can you fix this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lai at Mar 21, 2023, 09:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM1-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Patria
8 months ago
Wait, can you really just roll back the virus-pattern file? That seems too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
8 months ago
Option C seems too complicated. Why roll back everything?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
9 months ago
I’m not sure about option D. Sounds too risky with the program files auto-rolling back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
9 months ago
No way, I’d go with option B. You need to roll back the scan-engine too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
9 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Just roll back the virus-pattern file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
9 months ago
I think the answer might be C, but it seems odd that we'd have to roll back everything just because of one corrupt file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
9 months ago
I feel like option A makes sense since it mentions retaining the scan engine, but what if that causes compatibility issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
9 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to roll back multiple components, but I can't recall if the scan engine needs to go back too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
9 months ago
I think we can roll back just the virus-pattern file without affecting the other updates, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
9 months ago
I think option D sounds right because it mentions the program files rolling back automatically, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether rolling back the virus-pattern file means we have to touch the other files too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
9 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to decide which components to roll back. I feel like option A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
9 months ago
I think we can roll back just the virus-pattern file, but I'm not sure if that affects the scan engine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The XML has multiple namespaces declared, and the Name element has a master:type attribute, so I'm not confident which namespace it belongs to. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
9 months ago
Tanzu Container Automation seems like it could be the product they're looking for, but I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. The options all sound similar, but I'm leaning towards D - Cloud-based Management. That seems like it would be the feature that enables remote management without a VPN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. VPRN is a VPN service, so the protocol used to exchange routes between PE devices would likely be a VPN-specific protocol like MP-BGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Does "Runtime" mean the number of cores or processors the client is using? Or is it the number of bots or instances that can run at the same time?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel