MENU
What is the difference between the architecture of Server Protect for Windows and the architecture of
Server Protect for Linux?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium TM1-101 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
SI
Sina
3 months ago
C is definitely the answer! Four-tier is more complex, fits Linux better.
SH
Shawnta
3 months ago
I feel like B could be right too. Dedicated server sounds familiar.
PA
Pamella
3 months ago
I think the answer is A. Two-tier architecture makes sense for Linux.
WI
William
3 months ago
B) is misleading, you can run it without a dedicated server.
ES
Essie
3 months ago
Wait, only 15 Normal Servers? That seems really limiting!
MA
Maia
4 months ago
Totally agree with A), it's pretty standard for Linux setups.
AD
Adela
5 months ago
I thought it was four-tier, so C) seems off to me.
EL
Elizabeth
5 months ago
A) is correct, Linux does use a two-tier architecture.
SA
Salome
6 months ago
I thought I read that Linux uses a four-tier architecture, but I might be mixing it up with another product.
ME
Melissa
6 months ago
I feel like Server Protect for Windows has a different setup, but I can't remember the specifics about the dedicated server requirement for Linux.
SE
Sean
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where it mentioned the number of servers in a domain, but I can't recall the exact limit for Linux.
ET
Ettie
6 months ago
I think I remember something about the architecture differences, but I'm not sure if it's two-tier or four-tier for Linux.