New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Trend Deep-Security-Professional Exam - Topic 1 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Trend's Deep-Security-Professional exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 1
[All Deep-Security-Professional Questions]

A Recommendation Scan is run to determine which Intrusion Prevention rules are appropriate for a Server. The scan is configured to apply the suggested rules automatically and ongoing scans are enabled. Some time later, an operating system patch is applied. How can you de-termine which Intrusion Prevention rules are no longer needed on this Server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Brock
3 months ago
Always good to double-check the rules after a patch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
3 months ago
Performance issues can arise, better to check what's needed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
3 months ago
Not sure about that, can we really trust it to unassign rules?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
4 months ago
I think the auto-scan will handle it just fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
4 months ago
A patch's READ ME file is super helpful for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
4 months ago
I believe the automatic scans do show rules for unassignment, but I wonder if they always catch everything after a patch is applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
I recall that performance isn't usually a concern with multiple rules, but it seems like a good idea to clean up unnecessary ones anyway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
4 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where the automatic scans would handle unneeded rules, but I'm not confident if they actually remove them or just suggest them for unassignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
5 months ago
I remember studying that the READ ME file can be really helpful for identifying changes, but I'm not entirely sure if it lists all the rules that can be disabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
Nice, that's a good strategy. I'll make sure to check the Recommended for Unassignment tab when the next scan runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
Ah, I see. The automatic scans will identify the rules that are no longer needed after the patch. That makes it pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Are the rules being applied automatically or do I need to manually disable them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to look at the patch details and compare that to the applied rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between the Architecture Definition Document and the Architecture Contract. I'll have to carefully consider the nuances of each deliverable to make the best guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions a consistent customer experience, so I'm not sure if self-support would be the best option. I might go with the Knowledge One with Article Recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. I thought thermal fatigue was more about the number of cycles than the operating temperature. I'll have to review my notes on this topic before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on the information provided, I think option A - writing to shareholders to explain the undervaluation - is the best approach. That will help rally shareholder support against the hostile bid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
2 years ago
I believe it's better to be proactive and check for unneeded rules ourselves to optimize performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
2 years ago
But why go through that trouble? The next scan will automatically unassign any unnecessary rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 years ago
I agree with Hayley. It's important to compare the list of addressed issues with the applied rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 years ago
I think we should check the READ ME file after the patch to see which rules are no longer needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 years ago
Actually, when the next scan is run, any unnecessary rules will be displayed on the Recommended for Unassignment tab in the IPS Rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 years ago
I heard that multiple rules can be applied without affecting performance, so maybe we don't even need to determine which rules to remove.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 years ago
That makes sense, but I believe the next Intrusion Prevention Recommendation Scan will automatically unassign any rules that are no longer needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 years ago
I think the READ ME file provided with the software patch can help us compare the list of issues addressed to the rules applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
2 years ago
Hey, how do we determine which Intrusion Prevention rules are no longer needed on a Server after applying an OS patch?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel