New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Tibco TCP-BW6 Exam - Topic 3 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tibco's TCP-BW6 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 3
[All TCP-BW6 Questions]

Which three actions are classed as 'Non-Destructive Changes' when upgrading a Case Data Model? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kathrine
4 months ago
Changing patterns on attributes? That sounds sketchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
4 months ago
D seems risky, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
4 months ago
Wait, isn't adding a mandatory attribute destructive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
4 months ago
I think C is also safe to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
5 months ago
A is definitely non-destructive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
5 months ago
I believe adding a mandatory attribute is destructive, but I might be mixing it up with another practice question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
5 months ago
I feel uncertain about changing multiplicity; it seems like it could be destructive, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think adding a new class might be considered non-destructive too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
5 months ago
I think making an attribute searchable or not is definitely a non-destructive change, but I'm not sure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks straightforward. I'll need to carefully review the storage account details and determine which one would be best suited for the boot diagnostics logs and snapshots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
5 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Neutral and complete could be related to relevance or comparability as well. I'll have to review my notes and try to remember the definitions of these fundamental characteristics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the question, it sounds like we need to enable some kind of security feature or protection on the VM to allow the application to create child processes. I'm guessing that "Exploit protection" is the right answer here, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel