Tibco Exam TCP-BW6 Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tibco's TCP-BW6 exam

Question #: 105
Topic #: 2

When programming a TIBCO Rendezvous fault-tolerant application, it is a documented best practice to associate fault-tolerant member events with ....

Athe default event queue

Ba low-priority queue

Ca system event queue

Da high-priority queue

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Romana at Jan 09, 2025, 10:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TCP-BW6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aliza

2 months ago

Wait, we're supposed to associate fault-tolerant events with something? I was just going to throw them in the trash and call it a day. Isn't that how fault-tolerance works?

upvoted 0 times

Ronny

9 days ago

D) a high-priority queue

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

10 days ago

C) a system event queue

upvoted 0 times

...

Orville

1 months ago

C) a system event queue

upvoted 0 times

...

Delpha

1 months ago

B) a low-priority queue

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

1 months ago

B) a low-priority queue

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonna

1 months ago

A) the default event queue

upvoted 0 times

...

Doug

1 months ago

A) the default event queue

upvoted 0 times

...

Diego

2 months ago

I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm picking A, the default event queue. What could possibly go wrong? Ooh, maybe they'll throw in a free unicorn if I get it right!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dierdre

2 months ago

C is the way to go, a system event queue. It's like putting the fault-tolerant stuff in the VIP lounge, you know? Gotta keep it separate from the regular plebs.

upvoted 0 times

Felicitas

1 months ago

I agree, keeping fault-tolerant stuff separate in a system event queue is important for reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxanne

2 months ago

C is definitely the way to go, a system event queue is like the VIP lounge for fault-tolerant events.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) a system event queue could also be a valid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

2 months ago

I'm going with B, a low-priority queue. That way, the fault-tolerant events don't clog up the main event processing. Who needs high-priority when you can just ignore them, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hana

2 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is D. A high-priority queue makes the most sense for fault-tolerant member events, right? You don't want those getting lost in the shuffle.

upvoted 0 times