New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group OGA-032 Exam - Topic 7 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGA-032 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 7
[All OGA-032 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

ArchiSurance has decided to leverage its financial expertise by offering defined contribution retirement plans. Each trading day, ArchiSurance submits consolidated mutual fund trading transactions to a stock exchange on behalf of its retirement plan

participants.

The daily mutual fund trading cycle consists of four key processes: Transaction capture, pricing, trading and reconciliation. Transaction capture consists of two sub-processes: manual exchange and loans and distributions (L&D). For transaction

capture, retirement plan participants use an online account management application to enter manual fund exchange transactions. For L&D, plan participants use a separate application to enter requests. The L&D application determines whether the

request can be fulfilled based on the mutual fund balances held in each plan balances and a set of business rules. Each day's captured manual exchange transactions accumulate in a transaction database.

ArchiSurance contracts with a third-party information service to receive a file of mutual fund prices at the close of each trading day. The pricing application uses this file to convert captured transaction into trades, and then validates each trade against the

mutual fund balances held in each plan. The pricing application generates a trade file with the minimum number of trades necessary. The trading application sends this file to an external trading service. When the trading application receives a

confirmation file back from the trading service, it passes it to the reconciliation application, which updates the plan recordkeeping database.

The lead application Architect has decided to merge the pricing application, the trading application and the reconciliation application into one application, which will be serving the pricing, trading and reconciliation processes respectively. The reason for

this is that maintenance costs for these three components are too high and the performance is too slow. This implementation will increase the performance and lower the maintenance cost significantly.

The CIO has agreed on this plan, but wants this to be done in two phases, each in a separate project. Phase 1 should include the merger of the Trading and Pricing applications. Phase 2 should then merge the merged applications with the Reconciliation

application respectively. Each project phase has a number of defined deliverables. Phase 1 has two deliverables, TraPri application implemented and tested' and 'Active TraPri application', which together form a first transition architecture. Phase 2 has

two deliverables, 'Recon 2.0 application implemented and tested' and 'Back-up applications phased out', which together form the second transition architecture. These two projects are part of the ArchiSurance application integration program scheduled

for the next 6 months.

Refer to the Scenario

You have been asked by the lead application architect to show how the applications used for daily trading can be migrated. This should include a description of the work packages, deliverables and transition architectures.

Which of the following answers best describes the applications and migration plan?

A.

B.

C.

D.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

We need to determine the best model that:

Shows the current applications and their functions -- Pricing, Trading, and Reconciliation applications.

Represents the migration phases --

Phase 1: Merges the Trading and Pricing applications into TraPri.

Phase 2: Merges TraPri with the Reconciliation application to create Recon 2.0.

Includes transition architectures -- Each phase has distinct deliverables marking the transition from old applications to new merged applications.

Shows the work packages and dependencies -- The sequence of activities leading to the final implementation.

Why D is the Best Choice:

Clearly distinguishes baseline (existing) applications and the new applications after the migration. Illustrates the two transition states correctly --

First transition: Implementation and activation of the TraPri application.

Second transition: Implementation of Recon 2.0 and phase-out of backup applications. Depicts the migration process sequentially -- Ensuring a clear understanding of how the applications evolve over time. Work packages and deliverables are well structured -- Aligning with the phases described in the scenario.

Why Not A, B, or C?

A: Does not correctly represent the transition phases and their deliverables.

B: Lacks clarity in differentiating baseline applications from transition architectures.

C: Misrepresents dependencies and transition states, making the migration process unclear.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
France
10 hours ago
It clearly outlines the phases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
6 days ago
Why B?
upvoted 0 times
...
France
11 days ago
I think Option B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
16 days ago
I feel overwhelmed by the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
21 days ago
This scenario is complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
26 days ago
Not sure if this will really improve performance as they claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 month ago
Definitely a good move to cut maintenance costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 month ago
Surprised they’re doing it in phases, seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
1 month ago
I'm a bit uncertain about the specifics of the work packages. Did we cover how to present those in relation to the transition architectures?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
2 months ago
This scenario reminds me of a practice question we did on application integration. I feel like the answer might hinge on how well the deliverables are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
2 months ago
I think the merging of applications makes sense to reduce maintenance costs, but I can't recall how the transition architectures should be structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of defining deliverables in project phases, but I'm not sure which option clearly outlines that for both phases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
I think merging could complicate things more than help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
2 months ago
Looks like a solid plan to merge those apps!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go, nice and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
3 months ago
D is straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
3 months ago
Good idea, clarity is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
3 months ago
Haha, Option A looks like a kindergartener drew it, definitely not the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
3 months ago
Option D is just too complicated, I don't think it's the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B, it seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
4 months ago
Option C looks the most comprehensive and well-planned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
4 months ago
The question is asking which option best describes the applications and migration plan, so I'll need to carefully compare the details in each answer choice to the information provided in the scenario. I'll want to make sure I select the choice that most accurately reflects the phased approach and deliverables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
4 months ago
This seems like a straightforward migration plan, but I want to make sure I fully understand the implications of merging these applications. The performance and maintenance benefits are mentioned, but I'll need to consider any potential risks or tradeoffs as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on the main applications - Pricing, Trading, and Reconciliation. The plan is to merge the Pricing and Trading apps first, then bring in the Reconciliation app in the second phase. I'll need to review the details on the specific deliverables for each phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
4 months ago
The question is asking about the applications and migration plan, so I'll need to focus on identifying the key applications and how they are being merged and transitioned. The phased approach with defined deliverables seems important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
5 months ago
This looks like a complex scenario with multiple applications and processes involved. I'll need to carefully read through the details to understand the key components and the proposed migration plan.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel