I'm going with C. It's the only option that really captures the cross-cutting, enterprise-wide nature of TOGAF's approach. Plus, it just sounds more impressive, doesn't it?
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking B might be the right answer, since an enterprise architecture often involves multiple subsidiaries. But C does sound more comprehensive.
I'm not sure, but I think D) The highest level of architecture that can be achieved in a given organization makes sense too. It sounds like it encompasses everything.
I think the correct answer is C. An architecture that crosses multiple systems and functional groups within the enterprise definitely sounds like the TOGAF definition of enterprise architecture.
Narcisa
23 days agoJohnathon
1 months agoIlene
18 days agoJenelle
1 months agoGearldine
2 months agoTijuana
2 months agoPolly
13 days agoCiara
15 days agoJessenia
20 days agoEdmond
26 days agoKris
1 months agoSelma
2 months agoHubert
2 months ago