I keep mixing up the purpose of the Architecture Definition Document with other TOGAF documents. I wonder if D could be correct since it mentions starting a cycle.
I think the Architecture Definition Document is mainly about communicating the architect's intent, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best answer.
I'm feeling confident about this question. The Architecture Definition Document is used to communicate the intent of the architect, so I'll choose option C.
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The Architecture Definition Document is meant to describe the architecture in a way that allows measurement of compliance, so I'll go with option B.
This seems like a straightforward TOGAF question. I'll focus on understanding the purpose of the Architecture Definition Document based on the options provided.
Option A sounds like something a management consultant would write. 'An agreement between development partners and sponsors'? I'm pretty sure TOGAF is above that corporate fluff.
D sounds like it might be the right answer. Didn't TOGAF say the Architecture Definition Document kicks off the whole process? I better double-check that...
I think option C is the correct answer. The Architecture Definition Document is meant to communicate the architect's intent, not just describe compliance or trigger a new cycle.
Osvaldo
6 months agoMargurite
6 months agoMollie
6 months agoJarvis
7 months agoMinna
7 months agoMarci
7 months agoBette
7 months agoJacqueline
7 months agoPenney
8 months agoAlyssa
8 months agoDevorah
8 months agoKiera
8 months agoJutta
8 months agoVilma
8 months agoLoren
1 year agoIsaac
1 year agoAdela
1 year agoQuiana
1 year agoReid
11 months agoSean
11 months agoSelene
11 months agoValentin
12 months agoKiera
1 year agoTorie
11 months agoDiego
11 months agoJacquelyne
12 months agoChauncey
1 year agoEmerson
1 year agoErnie
1 year ago