I keep mixing up the purpose of the Architecture Definition Document with other TOGAF documents. I wonder if D could be correct since it mentions starting a cycle.
I think the Architecture Definition Document is mainly about communicating the architect's intent, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best answer.
I'm feeling confident about this question. The Architecture Definition Document is used to communicate the intent of the architect, so I'll choose option C.
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The Architecture Definition Document is meant to describe the architecture in a way that allows measurement of compliance, so I'll go with option B.
This seems like a straightforward TOGAF question. I'll focus on understanding the purpose of the Architecture Definition Document based on the options provided.
Option A sounds like something a management consultant would write. 'An agreement between development partners and sponsors'? I'm pretty sure TOGAF is above that corporate fluff.
D sounds like it might be the right answer. Didn't TOGAF say the Architecture Definition Document kicks off the whole process? I better double-check that...
I think option C is the correct answer. The Architecture Definition Document is meant to communicate the architect's intent, not just describe compliance or trigger a new cycle.
Osvaldo
3 months agoMargurite
3 months agoMollie
3 months agoJarvis
4 months agoMinna
4 months agoMarci
4 months agoBette
4 months agoJacqueline
4 months agoPenney
5 months agoAlyssa
5 months agoDevorah
5 months agoKiera
5 months agoJutta
5 months agoVilma
5 months agoLoren
9 months agoIsaac
9 months agoAdela
9 months agoQuiana
9 months agoReid
8 months agoSean
8 months agoSelene
8 months agoValentin
9 months agoKiera
10 months agoTorie
8 months agoDiego
8 months agoJacquelyne
9 months agoChauncey
11 months agoEmerson
11 months agoErnie
11 months ago