MENU
TOGAF uses a version numbering convention to illustrate the evolution of the Baseline and Target Architecture Definitions. Which version number in this convention indicates a high-level outline of the architecture?
Suggested Answer: E
Get Premium OG0-091 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
JA
Javier
11 months ago
I read somewhere that 1.5 is just an update, not a high-level outline.
ST
Stefania
11 months ago
Not sure about 0.5 being high-level, seems too low.
LA
Lavonda
12 months ago
Wait, isn't 1.0 usually the final version?
PU
Pura
12 months ago
Totally agree, 0.9 makes sense!
TY
Tyisha
12 months ago
I think it's Version 0.9 for the high-level outline.
AR
Arminda
1 year ago
I thought version 1.5 was more detailed, so it might be 0.9 for the high-level outline, but I’m not completely confident.
KR
Kris
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where version 1.0 was the final release, so maybe version 0.9 is the outline?
HU
Hui
1 year ago
I think I remember that lower version numbers like 0.1 or 0.5 indicate earlier drafts, but I'm not sure which one is the high-level outline.
AR
Ardella
1 year ago
I feel like version 0.1 is the earliest stage, but I can't recall if that's the high-level outline or just a draft.
GI
Gilma
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards Option C, assigning the Field Service Mobile License, since the question states the Technicians already have the other Salesforce Field Service licenses.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by visualizing the VPLS topology and how the devices are connected. Then I'll think through the impact of the SDP failure and which devices would still be reachable through the VPLS. I'm feeling pretty confident I can work this out.
JA
Jacob
1 year ago
I think option "D" is right because it makes sense that they would cause unauthorized purchases that the company wouldn’t need.
KI
Kimberely
1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I'd go with option B - creating a custom VM image with all the dependencies pre-installed. That should minimize the startup time for the VMs.