Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group OG0-091 Exam - Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OG0-091 exam

Question #: 99
Topic #: 1

[All OG0-091 Questions]

During a TOGAF ADM cycle, an architecture is denoted as Version 1.0. What does this indicate?

AA high-level outline architecture

BA formally reviewed, preliminary architecture

CA draft, detailed architecture

DA formally reviewed, detailed architecture

EA preliminary outline architecture

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Jesusita at Sep 18, 2024, 10:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OG0-091 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ressie

7 months ago

I agree, it’s more than just an outline.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

8 months ago

Definitely a formally reviewed architecture, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

8 months ago

Wait, is it really just a draft? Seems too formal for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colton

8 months ago

I thought it was a preliminary architecture, not a draft!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

8 months ago

Version 1.0 usually means it's a draft architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldine

9 months ago

I lean towards it being a preliminary outline architecture, but I could be mixing it up with another practice question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

9 months ago

This question feels familiar; I think it relates to the difference between preliminary and detailed architectures in TOGAF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

9 months ago

I remember something about draft architectures being labeled as 1.0, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Skye

9 months ago

I think Version 1.0 might indicate a formally reviewed architecture, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

9 months ago

Based on my understanding of the TOGAF ADM cycle, a Version 1.0 architecture is a formally reviewed, detailed architecture. I'm pretty sure the answer is D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adolph

9 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of the options. I'll need to re-read the question and the choices a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ines

9 months ago

Okay, let me break this down. Version 1.0 indicates a formally reviewed, detailed architecture, so I think the answer is D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between a "high-level outline architecture" and a "preliminary outline architecture". I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

9 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about the TOGAF ADM cycle. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

2 years ago

Haha, Version 1.0? More like Version 0.5 if you ask me. But seriously, I think D is the way to go here. Anything less just wouldn't cut it for a TOGAF architecture.

upvoted 0 times

Jacquelyne

2 years ago

Totally, anything less than that wouldn't meet the standards for TOGAF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuonne

2 years ago

Yeah, Version 1.0 should definitely be a formally reviewed, detailed architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharee

2 years ago

I agree, D seems like the most appropriate option for a TOGAF architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Marshall

2 years ago

D all the way, baby! Version 1.0 has got to be the real deal, not some half-baked draft. Gotta love that attention to detail in TOGAF!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kizzy

2 years ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. But I'm going to go with D just to be safe. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture sounds like it would be considered Version 1.0.

upvoted 0 times

Georgene

2 years ago

User 4: I'm going with D too, it seems like the most logical option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elmira

2 years ago

User 3: Yeah, that makes sense. D seems like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

2 years ago

I agree, I'll go with D for a formally reviewed, detailed architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannetta

2 years ago

I think it's either B or D.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Ernestine

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think it could also be a high-level outline architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

2 years ago

I agree with Ozell, Version 1.0 usually means it has gone through a review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

2 years ago

I think it indicates a formally reviewed, preliminary architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

2 years ago

I'm going with B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture. That seems like the most logical step in the TOGAF ADM cycle before moving to a detailed version.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anthony

2 years ago

I think the answer is D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture. Anything less than that doesn't seem like it would be denoted as Version 1.0, right?

upvoted 0 times

Sommer

2 years ago

D: I agree with C. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

2 years ago

C: I'm going with D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

2 years ago

B: I think it's E. A preliminary outline architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlesetta

2 years ago

A: I believe it's B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

...