New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Talend Data-Integration-Developer Exam - Topic 7 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Talend's Data-Integration-Developer exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 7
[All Data-Integration-Developer Questions]

You have two Talend Jobs. Job A need to call Job B. After Job B is complete, processed data stored in the tBufferOutput buffer memory must be transferred back to Job A.

How can you achieve this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Trace Debug and Java Debug are two modes that allow you to debug your jobs in Talend Studio. Trace Debug mode allows you to trace each row processed by your job components and see the values of each column in each row. Java Debug mode allows you to debug your job code in Java or Perl and see the values of each variable or expression in your code.

The characteristics that distinguish Trace Debug from Java Debug are:

Trace Debug mode allows row-by-row inspection of data flows, while Java Debug mode does not. Data flows are the links that show the data transfer between components in your job design workspace. In Trace Debug mode, you can see the data flow on each trace and inspect the values of each column for each row processed by your job. You can also use filters to display only the rows that match a condition or an expression. In Java Debug mode, you cannot see the data flow on each trace or inspect the values of each column for each row.

Trace Debug mode supports breakpoints based on input data condition, while Java Debug mode does not. Breakpoints are points where the execution of your job pauses and waits for your action. You can use breakpoints to inspect your data or debug your logic at specific points of your job execution. In Trace Debug mode, you can set breakpoints on traces based on a condition or an expression that involves input data columns. For example, you can set a breakpoint to pause your job when a customer name contains a certain string or when a product price exceeds a certain value. In Java Debug mode, you can only set breakpoints on lines of code based on a condition or an expression that involves variables or expressions.

The characteristics that do not distinguish Trace Debug from Java Debug are:

Both modes require a separate perspective. A perspective is a set of views and editors that are arranged in a specific way to support a specific task. In Talend Studio, you can switch between different perspectives, such as Integration, Debug, Profiling, etc. To use Trace Debug mode, you need to switch to the Debug perspective by clicking on the Open Perspective button and selecting Debug. To use Java Debug mode, you need to switch to the Java perspective by clicking on the Open Perspective button and selecting Java.

Neither mode requires Java development experience. Although Java Debug mode allows you to debug your job code in Java or Perl, you do not need to have Java development experience to use it. You can use the graphical interface of Talend Studio to design your job components and properties without writing any code. You can also use the Code view to see the generated code of your job in Java or Perl and modify it if needed. However, you do not need to write any code from scratch or understand all the details of the code to use Java Debug mode.Reference:Talend Open Studio: Open-source ETL and Free Data Integration | Talend, [Trace Debug mode - 7.3], [Java Debug mode - 7.3]


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jesusita
3 months ago
Definitely not C, that one seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
3 months ago
Surprised there's so many options! Are they all valid?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
4 months ago
Wait, isn't A the one that works?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
4 months ago
I think D is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
4 months ago
Gotta go with option B for the advanced settings!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
4 months ago
I thought we had to select "Transmit whole context" in the advanced settings, but now I'm second-guessing if it should be the basic settings instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
4 months ago
I feel like "Propagate the child result" is the right choice, but I can't remember if it was in the basic or advanced settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to pass data between jobs. I think it was about using the output schema, but I can't recall the exact option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
I think we need to look at the settings in the tRunJob component, but I'm not sure if it's the basic or advanced settings that matter here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one, but I think option C might be the right approach to propagate the child job's result back to the parent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy - I'll try option B first, since that seems like the most direct way to transfer the whole context between the jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the tBufferOutput buffer memory part - I'll need to review how that works in Talend to make sure I understand the full requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question, I think the key is understanding how to use the tRunJob component to pass data between the two jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
10 months ago
Option E: Forget the whole thing, just use a carrier pigeon to transfer the data. Way more reliable than any of these Talend shenanigans.
upvoted 0 times
Hayley
8 months ago
C) Select the Propagate the child result to output schema in Advanced settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
8 months ago
B) Select the Transmit whole context in Advanced settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
9 months ago
A) Select the Transmit whole context in the basic settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maurine
10 months ago
Ah, the old 'transfer data from Job B to Job A' conundrum. Option B all the way, my friends. Transmit that context like there's no tomorrow!
upvoted 0 times
Genevive
9 months ago
I agree, Option A could also be a valid choice. It's all about how you want to handle the data transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
9 months ago
I think Option A might work too. Transmitting the whole context in the basic settings sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
9 months ago
Option B all the way, my friends. Transmit that context like there's no tomorrow!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between B and D, but I think I'll go with B. Transmitting the whole context is probably the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
9 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but I think D might be the better option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, B sounds like the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
10 months ago
User 1: I think I'll go with B. Transmitting the whole context is probably the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clay
11 months ago
I'm going with option C. Propagating the child result to the output schema in the Advanced settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job B sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Penney
9 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Propagating the child result to the output schema in the Basic settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
9 months ago
I'm going with option C. Propagating the child result to the output schema in the Advanced settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job B sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct answer. Transmitting the whole context in the Advanced settings of the tRunJob provides more control and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
10 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Transmitting the whole context in the basic settings of the tRunJob seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think A) makes more sense because it's in the basic settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Transmitting the whole context in the Advanced settings of the tRunJob seems like the right way to pass data back from Job B to Job A.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
9 months ago
User 4: Definitely, option B seems like the most appropriate solution for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
9 months ago
User 3: I agree, that's the best way to pass data back from Job B to Job A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, selecting Transmit whole context in the Advanced settings of tRunJob sounds like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
10 months ago
Yes, selecting Transmit whole context in the Advanced settings of the tRunJob is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
10 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
10 months ago
I agree, Option B is the correct way to achieve this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johnna
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Select the Transmit whole context in Advanced settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Select the Transmit whole context in the basic settings of the tRunJob when calling Job B from Job A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel