Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SUSE SCA_SLES15 Exam - Topic 8 Question 31 Discussion

Which statements regarding subvolumes in a BtrFS filesystem are true (Choose two)
B) Even though subvolumes in BtrFS appear to be subdirectories, subvolumes can be mounted separately. The -o sub= and D) Multiple virtual filesystems can be created inside the BtrFS filesystem.
A) Every subvolume on a BtrFS filesystem must have the same quota if quotas are implemented.
C) Every subvolume on a BtrFS fiLesystem must have a name that begins with the '@' character.

SUSE SCA_SLES15 Exam - Topic 8 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for SUSE's SCA_SLES15 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 8
[All SCA_SLES15 Questions]

Which statements regarding subvolumes in a BtrFS filesystem are true (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Annabelle at May 05, 2022, 05:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SCA_SLES15 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hyun
8 months ago
Totally agree, the separate mounting feature is super useful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenia
8 months ago
Wait, can you really create multiple virtual filesystems in BtrFS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
9 months ago
Quotas are optional, not mandatory for all subvolumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
9 months ago
I thought all subvolumes had to start with '@'?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
9 months ago
Subvolumes can definitely be mounted separately!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
9 months ago
I thought every subvolume had to start with '@', but I can't recall if that's a strict rule or just a convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
9 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think multiple virtual filesystems can exist in BtrFS, which might make D true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like all subvolumes having the same quota is not a requirement, so A seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
9 months ago
I remember something about subvolumes being able to be mounted separately, so I think option B might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
9 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by eliminating the obviously incorrect options, then focus on the more ambiguous ones to determine the minimum required role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. There are a lot of moving parts to consider - national principles, data controllers, penalties, and even a constitutional right to privacy. I'll have to weigh each option carefully to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The access team templates should work, but we'll need to be careful to only grant access to the specific opportunity that the two departments are collaborating on, not the entire set of opportunities for each department. That way, we can meet the requirement of keeping the other opportunities private.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel