MENU
Which statements regarding subvolumes in a BtrFS filesystem are true (Choose two)
Suggested Answer: B, D
Get Premium SCA_SLES15 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
HY
Hyun
11 months ago
Totally agree, the separate mounting feature is super useful!
KE
Kenia
11 months ago
Wait, can you really create multiple virtual filesystems in BtrFS?
NI
Nicolette
12 months ago
Quotas are optional, not mandatory for all subvolumes.
EL
Eladia
12 months ago
I thought all subvolumes had to start with '@'?
HE
Helga
12 months ago
Subvolumes can definitely be mounted separately!
KA
Kaycee
1 year ago
I thought every subvolume had to start with '@', but I can't recall if that's a strict rule or just a convention.
CA
Cammy
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think multiple virtual filesystems can exist in BtrFS, which might make D true.
BR
Brock
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like all subvolumes having the same quota is not a requirement, so A seems off to me.
ME
Melinda
1 year ago
I remember something about subvolumes being able to be mounted separately, so I think option B might be correct.
WY
Wynell
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by eliminating the obviously incorrect options, then focus on the more ambiguous ones to determine the minimum required role.
LE
Leandro
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. There are a lot of moving parts to consider - national principles, data controllers, penalties, and even a constitutional right to privacy. I'll have to weigh each option carefully to determine the best approach.
KA
Karol
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The access team templates should work, but we'll need to be careful to only grant access to the specific opportunity that the two departments are collaborating on, not the entire set of opportunities for each department. That way, we can meet the requirement of keeping the other opportunities private.