Splunk Exam SPLK-4001 Topic 2 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-4001 exam

Question #: 24
Topic #: 2

A DevOps engineer wants to determine if the latency their application experiences is growing fester after a new software release a week ago. They have already created two plot lines, A and B, that represent the current latency and the latency a week ago, respectively. How can the engineer use these two plot lines to determine the rate of change in latency?

ACreate a temporary plot by dragging items A and B into the Analytics Explorer window.

BCreate a plot C using the formula (A-B) and add a scale:percent function to express the rate of change as a percentage.

CCreate a plot C using the formula (A/B-l) and add a scale: 100 function to express the rate of change as a percentage.

DCreate a temporary plot by clicking the Change% button in the upper-right corner of the plot showing lines A and B.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A. 64.

According to the web search results, the limit on the number of properties that an MTS can have is 64. A property is a key-value pair that you can assign to a dimension of an existing MTS to add more context to the metrics. For example, you can add the property use: QA to the host dimension of your metrics to indicate that the host is used for QA1

Properties are different from dimensions, which are key-value pairs that are sent along with the metrics at the time of ingest. Dimensions, along with the metric name, uniquely identify an MTS. The limit on the number of dimensions per MTS is 362

To learn more about how to use properties and dimensions in Splunk Observability Cloud, you can refer to this documentation2.

1: https://docs.splunk.com/Observability/metrics-and-metadata/metrics-dimensions-mts.html#Custom-properties 2: https://docs.splunk.com/Observability/metrics-and-metadata/metrics-dimensions-mts.html

by Valda at Jul 18, 2024, 05:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-4001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alayna

3 days ago

Interesting point, Jaime. I can see how that approach might provide a different perspective on the rate of change in latency. It's definitely worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

6 days ago

I disagree, I believe option C is better. Dividing the latencies and then subtracting 1 to express the change as a percentage seems more accurate to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alayna

10 days ago

I think option B is the way to go. Subtracting the latency from a week ago from the current latency and expressing it as a percentage makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...