Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-3003 Exam - Topic 7 Question 7 Discussion

In a large cloud customer environment with many (>100) dynamically created endpoint systems, each with a UF already deployed, what is the best approach for associating these systems with an appropriate serverclass on the deployment server?
C) Work with the cloud orchestration team to dynamically insert an appropriate clientName setting into each endpoint's local/deploymentclient.conf which can be matched by whitelist in serverclass.conf.
A) Work with the cloud orchestration team to create a common host-naming convention for these systems so a simple pattern can be used in the serverclass.conf whitelist attribute.
B) Create a CSV lookup file for each severclass, manually keep track of the endpoints within this CSV file, and leverage the whitelist.from_pathname attribute in serverclass.conf.
D) Using an installation bootstrap script run a CLI command to assign a clientName setting and permit serverclass.conf whitelist simplification.

Splunk SPLK-3003 Exam - Topic 7 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3003 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 7
[All SPLK-3003 Questions]

In a large cloud customer environment with many (>100) dynamically created endpoint systems, each with a UF already deployed, what is the best approach for associating these systems with an appropriate serverclass on the deployment server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Alesia at May 06, 2022, 10:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-3003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Antione
8 months ago
Wait, are we really trusting a script for this? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
8 months ago
D is interesting, but can it really simplify things that much?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
9 months ago
C is a solid approach, love the automation aspect!
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
9 months ago
I disagree, B sounds too manual and error-prone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
9 months ago
A seems like the easiest way to manage naming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
9 months ago
D seems interesting, but I wonder if the bootstrap script would be complicated to implement in such a large environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
9 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where dynamically setting clientName was emphasized. I think C could be a good approach too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
9 months ago
I'm not sure about B; manually tracking endpoints in a CSV sounds really tedious and prone to errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
9 months ago
I think option A makes sense since having a common naming convention could simplify the management of so many endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
9 months ago
I've got this! The key here is to use Flow Builder to create a process that checks the stage of the Opportunity and then makes the fields read-only if it's in the Clousd stage. Simple as that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
9 months ago
Based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is option C - a CNAME record that maps afdverify.www.contoso.com to ContosoFD1.azurefd.net. This allows us to test the Front Door setup without affecting the main website.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key details - the device has the same IP as the LTM management address, so I need to find an alternative way to access the LTM.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel