MENU
A customer has three users and is planning to ingest 250GB of data per day. They are concerned with search uptime, can tolerate up to a two-hour downtime for the search tier, and want advice on single search head versus a search head cluster. (SHC).
Which recommendation is the most appropriate?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium SPLK-3003 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
KI
Kip
11 months ago
Not sure about that, seems risky with just one search head.
TA
Tamesha
11 months ago
Totally agree, SHC is the way to go for HA!
AD
Adelle
12 months ago
Wait, can a single search head really handle 250GB a day?
BL
Blondell
12 months ago
I think a single search head with a warm standby could work too.
HE
Herminia
12 months ago
A SHC is definitely better for high data volumes.
BE
Bernardo
1 year ago
I feel like option D could work since it mentions a warm standby, but I’m not sure if that’s enough for their uptime requirements.
RI
Rikki
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it mentions the high data volume, but I’m a bit confused about how many members they should start with.
YV
Yvette
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about HA setups, and I feel like option A could provide better uptime, but I’m not confident about the load balancer aspect.
SH
Shoshana
1 year ago
I think a search head cluster might be necessary due to the high volume of data, but I'm not sure if they really need multiple active search heads right away.
PR
Providencia
1 year ago
The best approach here is to focus on how rolling wave planning prevents the buildup of unnecessary requirements. That's the real benefit that senior management needs to understand.
EV
Evelynn
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to develop a clear program charter that outlines the scope, objectives, and governance for the program. That will provide the foundation to then create the program management plan.