Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-3003 Exam - Topic 3 Question 11 Discussion

A customer has three users and is planning to ingest 250GB of data per day. They are concerned with search uptime, can tolerate up to a two-hour downtime for the search tier, and want advice on single search head versus a search head cluster. (SHC).Which recommendation is the most appropriate?
D) The customer should deploy a single search head with a warm standby search head and an rsync process to synchronize configurations.
A) The customer should deploy two active search heads behind a load balancer to support HA.
B) The customer should deploy a SHC with a single member for HA; more members can be added later.
C) The customer should deploy a SHC, because it will be required to support the high volume of data.

Splunk SPLK-3003 Exam - Topic 3 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3003 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 3
[All SPLK-3003 Questions]

A customer has three users and is planning to ingest 250GB of data per day. They are concerned with search uptime, can tolerate up to a two-hour downtime for the search tier, and want advice on single search head versus a search head cluster. (SHC).

Which recommendation is the most appropriate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Salome at May 05, 2022, 01:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-3003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kip
8 months ago
Not sure about that, seems risky with just one search head.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
8 months ago
Totally agree, SHC is the way to go for HA!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
9 months ago
Wait, can a single search head really handle 250GB a day?
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
9 months ago
I think a single search head with a warm standby could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
9 months ago
A SHC is definitely better for high data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
9 months ago
I feel like option D could work since it mentions a warm standby, but I’m not sure if that’s enough for their uptime requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it mentions the high data volume, but I’m a bit confused about how many members they should start with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question about HA setups, and I feel like option A could provide better uptime, but I’m not confident about the load balancer aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
9 months ago
I think a search head cluster might be necessary due to the high volume of data, but I'm not sure if they really need multiple active search heads right away.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
9 months ago
The best approach here is to focus on how rolling wave planning prevents the buildup of unnecessary requirements. That's the real benefit that senior management needs to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to develop a clear program charter that outlines the scope, objectives, and governance for the program. That will provide the foundation to then create the program management plan.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel