Splunk SPLK-3003 Exam - Topic 10 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3003 exam

Question #: 34
Topic #: 10

When monitoring and forwarding events collected from a file containing unstructured textual events, what is the difference in the Splunk2Splunk payload traffic sent between a universal forwarder (UF) and indexer compared to the Splunk2Splunk payload sent between a heavy forwarder (HF) and the indexer layer? (Assume that the file is being monitored locally on the forwarder.)

AThe payload format sent from the UF versus the HF is exactly the same. The payload size is identical because they're both sending 64K chunks.

BThe UF sends a stream of data containing one set of medata fields to represent the entire stream, whereas
the HF sends individual events, each with their own metadata fields attached, resulting in a lager payload.

CThe UF will generally send the payload in the same format, but only when the sourcetype is specified in the inputs.conf and EVENT_BREAKER_ENABLE is set to true.

DThe HF sends a stream of 64K TCP chunks with one set of metadata fields attached to represent the entire stream, whereas the UF sends individual events, each with their own metadata fields attached.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jesusa at May 05, 2022, 08:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-3003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elliott

5 months ago

The HF definitely has more overhead with all that metadata.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edward

5 months ago

I think the HF does send larger payloads, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Theresia

6 months ago

Wait, are you sure about the payload size difference?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marshall

6 months ago

Totally agree, the HF has more metadata per event!

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

6 months ago

The UF sends a stream, while the HF sends individual events.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

6 months ago

I thought the HF sends data in 64K chunks, but I’m confused about whether the UF sends individual events or not. I might lean towards option D, but I need to double-check.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

6 months ago

I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about the HF sending larger payloads because it breaks down events more. Maybe it’s option B?

upvoted 0 times

...

France

6 months ago

I think the difference is mainly about how the metadata is handled. The UF might send a single set for the whole stream, while the HF sends metadata for each event.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

6 months ago

I feel like I studied something about the sourcetype and EVENT_BREAKER_ENABLE affecting how the UF sends data, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nidia

6 months ago

This question seems straightforward - the long-term aspect of capital budgeting is the key challenge for management accountants. I think the answer is B, since capital projects affect multiple accounting periods.

upvoted 0 times

...

Steffanie

6 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about configuring payment options in the Business Manager. I'll carefully review the options and think through the logical flow to determine the right module.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

6 months ago

Smoke tests are usually the first step to ensure basic functionality, but I think the question is asking about a more comprehensive approach to validating end-user behavior. Let me think this through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pauline

6 months ago

I think it could be number of specialists. Any willing provider laws might cause confusion or lead to oversupply, but I should double-check that before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...