Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-3001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 128 Discussion

The Brute Force Access Behavior Detected correlation search is enabled, and is generating many false positives. Assuming the input data has already been validated. How can the correlation search be made less sensitive?
B) Edit the search, look for where or xswhere statements, and after the threshold value being compared to make it less common match.
A) Edit the search and modify the notable event status field to make the notable events less urgent.
C) Edit the search, look for where or xswhere statements, and alter the threshold value being compared to make it a more common match.
D) Modify the urgency table for this correlation search and add a new severity level to make notable events from this search less urgent.

Splunk SPLK-3001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 128 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3001 exam
Question #: 128
Topic #: 2
[All SPLK-3001 Questions]

The Brute Force Access Behavior Detected correlation search is enabled, and is generating many false positives. Assuming the input data has already been validated. How can the correlation search be made less sensitive?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tawna
2 hours ago
I vaguely remember that making notable events less urgent could help with false positives, so maybe option A or D could be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
5 days ago
I feel like the where or xswhere statements are key, but I can't recall if we should increase or decrease the threshold value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
10 days ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to modify the urgency of notable events. I wonder if option D is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
16 days ago
I remember discussing how adjusting the threshold values can help reduce false positives, but I'm not sure if it's about making it more or less common.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel