Which of these generates a summary index containing a count of events by productId?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium SPLK-1004 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
To generate a summary index containing a count of events by productId, the correct search command would be | stats count by productId (Option A). This command aggregates the events by productId, counting the number of events for each unique productId value. The stats command is a fundamental Splunk command used for aggregation and summarization, making it suitable for creating summary data like counts by specific fields.
41 comments · newest first
MA
Marvel
10 months ago
A is the standard way to do it, no doubt!
AR
Ardella
11 months ago
D seems off, it should be stats not sistats.
RE
Reta
11 months ago
Surprised that C is even an option, that's not a valid command!
AS
Ashlyn
11 months ago
I think B is incorrect, it doesn't count events.
ER
Erasmo
11 months ago
A is definitely the right choice!
EL
Eladia
12 months ago
I’m confused about the spelling in option C; it says "sistats" instead of "stats." That can't be right, can it?
IN
Ines
12 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this before, and I think it was definitely about using "count." So, A seems likely.
BR
Broderick
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "sum" not being the right function for counting. Maybe it's A?
YA
Yaeko
1 year ago
I think option A is correct because it uses "stats count by productId," which sounds like what we practiced for counting events.
LA
Laticia
1 year ago
Option A seems to be the one that generates the summary index with the count of events by productId, so that's my best guess.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the options, I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
RO
Rolland
1 year ago
The key here is to generate a summary index with a count by productId. I'm pretty sure option A does that.
MI
Michell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me think through the options carefully.
JO
Josephine
1 year ago
This looks straightforward, I think option A is the correct answer.
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
Option A sounds right to me. I remember seeing examples of that in the Django documentation. The other options don't seem to match what I've seen before.
LA
Lashonda
1 year ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I can see the logic behind a few of these options, but I'm not totally confident in any of them. Maybe I'll need to re-read the question a few times and think it through step-by-step. Documenting the stakeholder discussions does seem like a good starting point, but I'm not sure if that's the complete solution.
SI
Simona
1 year ago
I've seen this problem before. My guess is it's either the StoreFront address in the Citrix Gateway profile or the missing DNS host entry on StoreFront.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
I think the user policy would be the best option here, since it's specifically about policies that apply to users.
BR
Brinda
2 years ago
Hmm, I wonder if D is a secret Splunk feature that only the true Splunk masters know about. Gotta keep an eye out for those hidden gems!
YV
Yvonne
2 years ago
B? Really? That just sums up the productId values, not the count of events. This is an easy one, folks.
EM
Emmanuel
2 years ago
I'm going with C because it sounds like it might be a special Splunk command, and who doesn't love a little Splunk magic?
CA
Cassi
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A and D. They both seem to be targeting the same thing, but A is more straightforward.
RO
Ronnie
2 years ago
I agree, A is more straightforward and likely the correct choice.
DA
Dalene
2 years ago
Let's go with A then, it seems to be the most logical option.
AR
Armanda
2 years ago
I think A is the correct option, it generates a summary index with a count of events by productId.
CO
Coletta
2 years ago
I agree, A is more straightforward and likely the correct choice.
SY
Sylvie
2 years ago
I think A is the correct answer, it generates a summary index with a count by productId.
GA
Garry
2 years ago
I agree, A) is more straightforward and likely the correct choice.
LA
Lanie
2 years ago
I think A) | stats count by productId is the correct option.
VE
Verdell
2 years ago
Option A is the way to go! It's the only one that actually generates a summary index with the count of events by productId.
MA
Madalyn
2 years ago
Option D is also incorrect, it doesn't use the correct syntax for generating a summary index with the count of events by productId.
LE
Leah
2 years ago
D) sistats summary_index by productid
CA
Carmela
2 years ago
Option C seems to have a typo, it should be 'stats' instead of 'sistats'.
CA
Catalina
2 years ago
C) | sistats count by productId
AU
Augustine
2 years ago
That option won't give us the count of events by productId, we need the count function for that.
PH
Phillip
2 years ago
B) | stats sum (productId)
LY
Lynsey
2 years ago
I think option A is correct, it will generate a summary index with the count of events by productId.
PE
Peggie
2 years ago
B) | stats sum (productId)
HE
Herman
2 years ago
A) | stats count by productId
VA
Van
2 years ago
You're right, option A is the correct one.
DA
Darci
2 years ago
A) | stats count by productId