Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-1002 Exam - Topic 9 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1002 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 9
[All SPLK-1002 Questions]

Which of the following searches can be used to define an event type?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

An event type in Splunk is defined by a search string that returns a specific set of events. The search string index=games sourcetype=score player=* score>9999 is valid because it filters events based on specific criteria directly within the main search command. This search will find all events in the games index with a sourcetype of score, where the player field exists, and the score is greater than 9999. This specificity and direct filtering make it suitable for defining an event type.


Splunk Docs: Create event types

by Rupert at Sep 19, 2024, 08:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-1002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosenda
4 months ago
Wait, can you really use A like that? Sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
5 months ago
D looks interesting, but I doubt it meets the criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
5 months ago
C seems off, not sure it defines an event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
5 months ago
I think B could work too, but not as well as A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
5 months ago
A is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
5 months ago
D seems off to me because using stats might not directly define an event type, but I could be mistaken.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to filter by player and score, so I feel like C could be a contender, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
6 months ago
I'm not really sure about B; it mentions a score threshold, but I don't remember if that's how event types are typically defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
6 months ago
I think option A might be correct since it uses a subsearch to filter player IDs, which seems relevant for defining an event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards C as well. The other choices seem a bit too broad or missing important details. C seems to hit all the right criteria for defining the event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
6 months ago
I think C is the best option here. The other choices seem to be missing key elements like the player field or the score condition. C looks like the most complete and straightforward way to define the event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the subquery in A is necessary, or if B or D might also work. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C, since it includes the player field and the score condition, which seems like the most direct way to define an event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) index=games sourcetype=score I where score>9999 could also be a valid option
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) index=games sourcetype=score player=* score>9999
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
2 years ago
I'm just glad the options don't include anything about coffee or rubber ducks. That would be a whole other level of confusion.
upvoted 0 times
Desiree
1 year ago
D) index=games sourcetype=score I stats count by player
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 year ago
C) index=games sourcetype=score player=* score>9999
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
1 year ago
B) index=games sourcetype=score I where score>9999
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
1 year ago
A) index=games sourcetype=score [search index=players | fields player_id]
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Telma
2 years ago
Option B is a bit too simple, don't you think? I'd go for something more specific like option C.
upvoted 0 times
Johnathon
1 year ago
Yeah, option C seems like the most precise search to define an event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
2 years ago
I think option C is the best choice for defining an event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
2 years ago
I agree, option B seems too broad. Option C looks more specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
2 years ago
Hmm, option D seems interesting. Counting players by the score could give some insights into the event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A might work too. Searching for player IDs could help define the event type.
upvoted 0 times
Filiberto
1 year ago
That's a good point. Option C might also work for defining the event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 year ago
C) index=games sourcetype=score player=* score>9999
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
1 year ago
I think option A is a good choice. It could help define the event type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 years ago
A) index=games sourcetype=score [search index=players | fields player_id]
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) index=games sourcetype=score [search index=players | fields player_id]
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 years ago
Option C looks like the best way to define an event type. It specifically filters the games sourcetype by the score criteria.
upvoted 0 times
Cherelle
2 years ago
No, I believe option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 years ago
I think option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel