Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-1002 Topic 6 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1002 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 6
[All SPLK-1002 Questions]

Consider the following search:

Index=web sourcetype=access_combined

The log shows several events that share the same JSESSIONID value (SD404K289O2F151). View the events as a group. From the following list, which search groups events by JSESSIONID?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

In Splunk, when using the chart command, the useother parameter can be set to false (f) to remove the 'OTHER' category, which is a bucket that Splunk uses to aggregate low-cardinality groups into a single group to simplify visualization. Here's how the options break down:

A) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action useother=f This command correctly sets the useother parameter to false, which would prevent the 'OTHER' category from being displayed in the resulting visualization.

B) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action usenull=f useother=t This command has useother set to true (t), which means the 'OTHER' category would still be included, so this is not a correct option.

C) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit=10 useother=f Similar to option A, this command also sets useother to false, additionally imposing a limit to the top 10 results, which is a way to control the granularity of the chart but also to remove the 'OTHER' category.

D) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit-10 This command has a syntax error (limit-10 should be limit=10) and does not include the useother=f clause. Therefore, it would not remove the 'OTHER' category, making it incorrect.

The correct answers to rewrite the syntax to remove the 'OTHER' category are options A and C, which explicitly set useother=f.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sheron
23 days ago
Ah, I see what you mean. We should be grouping the events by the JSESSIONID value given in the question, not searching for a specific one. Clever!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
28 days ago
Wait, are we supposed to be searching for the correct JSESSIONID value or the one that was provided in the question? I'm getting a bit confused here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
29 days ago
Nah, the fourth option is just searching for a specific JSESSIONID value, not grouping the events together.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
16 days ago
B) index=web sourcetype=access_combined | transaction JSESSIONID | search SD470K92802F117
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
21 days ago
A) index=web sourcetype=access_combined | highlight JSESSIONID | search SD470K92802F117
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Esteban
1 months ago
Hmm, the third option looks promising, but it doesn't seem to group the events specifically by JSESSIONID.
upvoted 0 times
Emerson
3 days ago
User3: But what about option C? It seems to display the JSESSIONID values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
17 days ago
User2: I agree, using the transaction command will group events by JSESSIONID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
21 days ago
User1: I think option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
2 months ago
Ah, I see. The transaction command would group the events by JSESSIONID as well. Good choice!
upvoted 0 times
Thea
16 days ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 months ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
2 months ago
The first option seems to be the right answer. It highlights the JSESSIONID, which should group the events by that value.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
2 days ago
B) index=web sourcetype=access_combined | transaction JSESSIONID | search SD470K92802F117
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
6 days ago
Yes, that option highlights the JSESSIONID which is what we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
24 days ago
A) index=web sourcetype=access_combined | highlight JSESSIONID | search SD470K92802F117
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dylan
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) index=web sourcetype=access_combined SD470K92802F117 | table JSESSIONID could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
I agree with Avery, using transaction to group events by JSESSIONID makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) index=web sourcetype=access_combined | transaction JSESSIONID | search SD470K92802F117
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel