Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-1002 Topic 6 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1002 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 6
[All SPLK-1002 Questions]

Consider the following search:

Index=web sourcetype=access_combined

The log shows several events that share the same JSESSIONID value (SD404K289O2F151). View the events as a group. From the following list, which search groups events by JSESSIONID?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

In Splunk, when using the chart command, the useother parameter can be set to false (f) to remove the 'OTHER' category, which is a bucket that Splunk uses to aggregate low-cardinality groups into a single group to simplify visualization. Here's how the options break down:

A) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action useother=f This command correctly sets the useother parameter to false, which would prevent the 'OTHER' category from being displayed in the resulting visualization.

B) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action usenull=f useother=t This command has useother set to true (t), which means the 'OTHER' category would still be included, so this is not a correct option.

C) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit=10 useother=f Similar to option A, this command also sets useother to false, additionally imposing a limit to the top 10 results, which is a way to control the granularity of the chart but also to remove the 'OTHER' category.

D) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit-10 This command has a syntax error (limit-10 should be limit=10) and does not include the useother=f clause. Therefore, it would not remove the 'OTHER' category, making it incorrect.

The correct answers to rewrite the syntax to remove the 'OTHER' category are options A and C, which explicitly set useother=f.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dana
2 days ago
Ah, I see. The transaction command would group the events by JSESSIONID as well. Good choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
9 days ago
The first option seems to be the right answer. It highlights the JSESSIONID, which should group the events by that value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
14 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) index=web sourcetype=access_combined SD470K92802F117 | table JSESSIONID could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
15 days ago
I agree with Avery, using transaction to group events by JSESSIONID makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
16 days ago
I think the answer is B) index=web sourcetype=access_combined | transaction JSESSIONID | search SD470K92802F117
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel