Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-1002 Exam - Topic 11 Question 78 Discussion

Consider the following search:index=web sourcetype=access_corabinedThe log shows several events that share the same jsesszonid value (SD462K101O2F267). View the events as a group.From the following list, which search groups events by jSSESSIONID?
A) index=web sourcetype=access_combined I transaction JSESSZONID I search SD462K101C2F267
B) index=web sourcetype=access_combined SD462K101O2F267 | table JSESSIONID
C) index=web sourcetype=access_combined | highlight JSESSIONID | search SD462K101O2F267
D) index=web sourcetype=access_combined JSESSTONID <SD42K101O2F267>

Splunk SPLK-1002 Exam - Topic 11 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1002 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 11
[All SPLK-1002 Questions]

Consider the following search:

index=web sourcetype=access_corabined

The log shows several events that share the same jsesszonid value (SD462K101O2F267). View the events as a group.

From the following list, which search groups events by jSSESSIONID?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The transaction command groups events that share a common value in a specified field, such as JSESSIONID, and that occur within a specified time range. The search command filters the results to show only the events that match the given value of JSESSIONID.This search groups the events by JSESSIONID and then shows only the events that have the value SD462K101C2F267 for JSESSIONID2

1: Splunk Core Certified Power User Track, page 9.2: Splunk Documentation, transaction command.


by Stevie at Dec 10, 2023, 03:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-1002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nu
7 months ago
I agree with A, but I’m surprised others think differently!
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
8 months ago
Wait, is D even a valid search?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
8 months ago
C looks interesting, but not sure it groups correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
8 months ago
I think B is better for grouping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
8 months ago
A is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
9 months ago
Option D looks off to me; I don't recall seeing that syntax before. It seems like it might be a typo with JSESSTONID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
9 months ago
I feel like option C could be relevant too, but I'm confused about how highlight works in this context. Does it actually group events?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using the table command in option B. It seems like it just displays data rather than grouping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
9 months ago
I think option A might be the right choice since it uses the transaction command, which is meant for grouping events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B as well. The "| table JSESSIONID" part seems like the clearest way to group the events by that field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Does "view the events as a group" mean we need to somehow display them together, or just identify the command that groups them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
9 months ago
Option B looks promising - using the "table" command to display the JSESSIONID field seems like it would group the events as requested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how each one would affect the search results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
9 months ago
This looks like a straightforward Splunk query question. I think the key is to identify the command that groups the events by the JSESSIONID value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
9 months ago
I think I remember something about Data Pump being able to clone a CDB, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll have to review my notes on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the conditional checks for the VG and LV size. I'll need to review the Ansible documentation on those modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
9 months ago
I'm not sure about sulfides accelerating corrosion in this case. I feel like we covered something about that, but it's hazy now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
10 months ago
From my notes, I believe that PUT specifically updates a resource with new information.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel