Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk SPLK-1001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Which statement describes field discovery at search time?
D) Splunk automatically discovers only fields directly related to the search results
A) Splunk automatically discovers only numeric fields
B) Splunk automatically discovers only alphanumeric fields
C) Splunk automatically discovers only manually configured fields

Splunk SPLK-1001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1001 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 4
[All SPLK-1001 Questions]

Which statement describes field discovery at search time?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Erick
8 months ago
I thought it was A at first, but now I'm not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
8 months ago
I agree with Tish, D makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
9 months ago
Wait, does Splunk really only discover numeric fields? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
9 months ago
Nah, I’m pretty sure it’s D. Only fields related to search results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
9 months ago
I think it's option B, right? Splunk does alphanumeric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
9 months ago
I thought it was only numeric fields that were automatically discovered, but now I’m questioning if that’s too limiting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options. Does Splunk really only discover fields related to the search results, or does it find more than that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question about field discovery, and I feel like it mentioned something about automatic discovery being broader than just manually configured fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 months ago
I think Splunk discovers both numeric and alphanumeric fields, but I'm not sure which one it prioritizes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
9 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with Netezza Replication Services. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with Alibaba Cloud ElasticSearch, so I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
9 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the key benefit is that it doesn't require a layer 2 loop prevention protocol like RSTP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Can the join condition fields be part of the index cache, the data cache, or both? That could make a difference in how I approach this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel