New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk SPLK-1001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1001 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 1
[All SPLK-1001 Questions]

At the time of searching the start time is 03:35:08.

Will it look back to 03:00:00 if we use -30m@h in searching?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Eden at May 09, 2022, 12:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-1001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jannette
4 months ago
Are you sure about that? Sounds off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
4 months ago
Nope, it won't go back that far.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
4 months ago
Wait, really? I thought it would just stay at 03:35:08.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
4 months ago
Totally agree, that's how the -30m@h works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
4 months ago
Yes, it will look back to 03:00:00.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
5 months ago
I feel like it should go back to 03:05:08 instead of 03:00:00, but I could be mixing it up with another practice question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the -30m@h part. Does that mean it only looks back to the hour mark or the exact time?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
5 months ago
I think it might look back to 03:00:00 since -30m@h suggests going back half an hour, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
5 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to calculate time ranges, and I think it did look back. So I would say yes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Hedging, short-term investment, and long-term investment all have some degree of uncertainty, but speculating seems to be the one where the future value and returns are the most unpredictable. I'm going to go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which option is the best fit, but I'm leaning towards Option B. It seems to be talking about a state law that allows for coverage of non-formulary drugs under certain conditions, which could potentially include off-label use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is C. The pool members whose nodes are failing the ICMP-based monitor will be marked disabled, while the others will be considered up.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel