Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SolarWinds Observability-Self-Hosted-Fundamentals Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for SolarWinds's Observability-Self-Hosted-Fundamentals exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All Observability-Self-Hosted-Fundamentals Questions]

An alert has been created to email when AppInsight for SQL detects a database fragmentation that exceeds 30%. The issue is not considered resolved unless the fragmentation is below 10%. How would the reset conditions be configured for this alert?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In advanced alerting scenarios, particularly with performance metrics like disk fragmentation or temperature, the 'Trigger Condition' and 'Reset Condition' often require different thresholds to prevent 'flapping'---a state where an alert rapidly toggles between triggered and reset states because the metric is hovering right at the threshold line. According to the SolarWinds Platform Alerting Guide, while the default behavior is to reset when trigger conditions are no longer true (Option D), this would reset the alert as soon as fragmentation hit 29.9%.

To satisfy the specific requirement where the issue is only 'resolved' at 10%, a custom Reset Condition must be defined. By selecting 'set reset condition to reset when condition is below a set percent,' the administrator can explicitly define a separate value ($10%$) from the trigger value ($30%$). This creates a 'deadband' or hysteresis effect, ensuring the alert remains active and visible until the database maintenance has successfully reduced the fragmentation to the desired healthy level. This configuration is essential for AppInsight applications where returning to a 'not-critical' state (e.g., 29%) does not necessarily mean the underlying performance bottleneck has been sufficiently remediated.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Latonia
15 days ago
Wait, so it won't reset automatically? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
20 days ago
Totally agree with C! That’s how it should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
25 days ago
I think D makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 month ago
C is the way to go! Reset when below a set percent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m a bit confused about how that would work in practice with the specific percentages mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
1 month ago
I feel like option A could be a valid choice too, but it seems like a manual reset would be less efficient for ongoing monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
2 months ago
I remember similar questions where we had to decide on reset conditions, and I think option D makes sense because it resets when the issue is no longer true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
2 months ago
I think the reset condition should be set to when the fragmentation is below a certain percentage, but I'm not sure if that's option C or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
2 months ago
I definitely recall that alerts should reset when the problem is resolved, so I think option D is the right choice, but I need to double-check the wording on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between manual reset and automatic reset. I guess it could be option A or D, but I lean towards D since it seems more automatic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to set conditions based on thresholds. I feel like option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
I think the reset condition should be based on when the fragmentation goes below a certain percentage, but I'm not sure if that's option C or D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel