MENU
Issuance of a duplicate or replacement check without voiding the original entry can result in paying a claim twice -- once to the claimant and again to:
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium SOFA-CFE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
CR
Craig
10 months ago
I thought it only affected service charges, not claims.
SH
Sharika
11 months ago
It's true, always void the original before issuing a duplicate.
DA
Darrin
11 months ago
Wait, can you really pay twice like that? Sounds odd.
LI
Lili
11 months ago
Definitely agree, I've seen it happen before.
TO
Tori
11 months ago
This can lead to double payments, so be careful!
TO
Tom
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards "aggregate write-ins," but I’m not completely confident. I need to double-check my notes on this topic.
SH
Shawnta
12 months ago
I feel like the answer could be "deposited cash," but I can't quite recall the details on why that would be the case.
RA
Raul
12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question about duplicate checks, and I think it had to do with service charges.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
I think the answer might be related to the claimant getting paid twice, but I'm not sure if it's the escheat fund or something else.
KA
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
Ugh, I'm really struggling with this question. The options don't seem to clearly match the issue being described. I'll have to guess and hope for the best.
VE
Verona
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to identify who would end up getting paid twice if the original check wasn't voided. I'm pretty confident I can figure out the right answer.
CA
Carline
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the implications of not voiding the original check. Let me think this through step-by-step.
MA
Mariann
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the consequences of issuing a duplicate check. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the potential outcomes.
JA
Janae
1 year ago
This question is like a magic trick - the answer is hidden in plain sight, but you have to really focus to see it.
LE
Lelia
1 year ago
D) aggregate write-ins
DU
Dulce
1 year ago
C) escheat fund
FR
Franklyn
1 year ago
A) deposited cash
BU
Burma
1 year ago
A) deposited cash? Seriously? That's just throwing good money after bad. I'm going with C, no doubt about it.
ER
Erin
1 year ago
Definitely, it's important to avoid paying a claim twice by being careful with check issuance.
SH
Shayne
1 year ago
Yeah, issuing a duplicate check without voiding the original can cause a lot of problems.
MI
Micah
1 year ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. It goes to the escheat fund.
VI
Vivienne
1 year ago
D) aggregate write-ins? Sounds like an accounting term, but I'm not convinced that's the right answer here.
TO
Tomoko
1 year ago
D) aggregate write-ins? Sounds like an accounting term, but I'm not convinced that's the right answer here.
CL
Clay
1 year ago
C) escheat fund
MY
Myra
1 year ago
A) deposited cash
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
I'm going with C) escheat fund. Feels like the most logical option to me, but I'll double-check just to be sure.
IS
Isreal
1 year ago
Let's make sure to verify the correct answer before finalizing our choice.
HI
Hildegarde
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C) escheat fund as well.
MA
Maia
1 year ago
I agree, it makes sense to double-check just to be sure.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
I think C) escheat fund is the correct answer.
KE
Keneth
1 year ago
Paying a claim twice? That's like getting a refund for the same item twice - it's a recipe for financial disaster!
LU
Luz
1 year ago
C) escheat fund
LE
Leslie
1 year ago
A) deposited cash
JO
Johnetta
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) aggregate write-ins because it involves recording multiple items together.
AH
Ahmed
2 years ago
I agree with Rex, because escheat fund is where unclaimed property goes.
RE
Rex
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) escheat fund.