Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SOFE Exam SOFA-CFE Topic 3 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for SOFE's SOFA-CFE exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 3
[All SOFA-CFE Questions]

Which insurance arrangement, which involved insurance of a loss that had previously occurred, similarly was found not to be insurance for federal income tax purposes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Mariann at Apr 19, 2023, 08:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SOFA-CFE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Adelina
3 months ago
Tax reserves? Now that's a new one. Is the IRS just making up insurance terms now? I'm sticking with B) retroactive, it's the only one that makes any sense.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
2 months ago
Yeah, tax reserves are important for insurance companies to ensure they can cover future claims. Retroactive insurance does make the most sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Tax reserves and retroactive both seem like valid options in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
2 months ago
I think retroactive makes sense too, it's like covering a loss that already happened.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 months ago
I think you're right, retroactive insurance is when coverage is provided for a loss that has already occurred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
2 months ago
Tax reserves are actually a common term in insurance, it's used to cover future claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 months ago
Tax reserves are actually a common term in insurance, it's used to set aside funds for potential future claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Velda
3 months ago
Annual statement, really? That's just basic accounting, not insurance. Gotta be B) retroactive, even if it sounds a bit sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
Brandee
1 months ago
I'm going with retroactive too, it just fits the description better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
It does sound a bit sketchy, but I think retroactive makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
2 months ago
Yeah, retroactive seems like the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
2 months ago
I agree, annual statement doesn't sound like insurance at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
2 months ago
Exactly, as long as it meets the criteria, it's considered insurance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
True, it's all about how the arrangement is structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
2 months ago
But it's still considered insurance for federal income tax purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
3 months ago
I agree, retroactive insurance does sound a bit sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matthew
3 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'm gonna go with B) retroactive, seems like the only option that fits the description. Though I gotta say, the IRS must have a sense of humor to call that 'insurance'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Tax reserves could also be a possible answer because it involves setting aside funds for potential future losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
3 months ago
I agree with Sherly, retroactive insurance involves covering losses that have already happened.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) retroactive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
3 months ago
Whoa, retroactive insurance? That's like trying to insure your house after it's already burned down. Pretty sure that's not how it works, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Olene
2 months ago
D) Tax reserves
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
2 months ago
C) reserved
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
2 months ago
B) retroactive
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
2 months ago
A) annual statement
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel