New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SOFE SOFA-CFE Exam - Topic 1 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for SOFE's SOFA-CFE exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 1
[All SOFA-CFE Questions]

The frequency of loss is the:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Helaine
2 months ago
No way, it can't be D, that's just wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
2 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple?
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
3 months ago
Totally agree, A is the correct answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
3 months ago
I thought it might be B for a second!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
3 months ago
It's definitely A, claims divided by exposures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
3 months ago
I definitely remember that frequency is about claims, but I can't remember if it's just claims or if there's something else involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the options. I don't recall anything about coverage extensions being involved in frequency calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about claims divided by exposures, so I might go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
4 months ago
I think the frequency of loss is related to claims and exposures, but I'm not sure if it's just a simple division.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
4 months ago
Okay, let me see... The frequency of loss is related to the number of claims and exposures, but I'm not sure if it's as simple as just dividing them. I'll have to double-check my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
4 months ago
The frequency of loss is a key concept in insurance, so I feel confident I can tackle this. I'll review the options and select the one that best matches the definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
5 months ago
This looks straightforward - the frequency of loss is just the number of claims divided by the number of exposures, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
9 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about A. The frequency of loss is a simple ratio of claims to exposures - no need to overcomplicate it.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
8 months ago
Yeah, A makes the most sense to me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
8 months ago
I agree, A seems like the most straightforward answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
9 months ago
I believe it's A as well, because it gives a clear ratio of claims to exposures
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
9 months ago
Haha, D is just a weird combination of random insurance terms. The frequency of loss is all about the number of claims and exposures, so A is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
8 months ago
A is the most straightforward option for calculating the frequency of loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
8 months ago
Definitely, A is the formula for determining the frequency of loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
8 months ago
Yeah, A makes the most sense when it comes to calculating the frequency of loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
8 months ago
I agree, A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's C) The number of coverage extensions divided by the number of exposures
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
9 months ago
D looks like a trick question. The frequency of loss has nothing to do with the number of coverage extensions or retroactive data. A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
8 months ago
Definitely, A is the number of claims divided by the number of exposures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
9 months ago
Yeah, A is the correct formula for calculating the frequency of loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
9 months ago
I agree, D does seem like a trick question. A makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kati
10 months ago
I think it's A too, because it makes sense to calculate loss frequency that way
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
10 months ago
A) The number of claims divided by the number of exposures
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
10 months ago
I'm torn between A and B, but I think A is the correct answer. The frequency of loss should be based on the number of claims, not the number of exposures minus the number of loss.
upvoted 0 times
Kip
9 months ago
Yeah, A is the frequency of loss calculation. It's important to consider the number of claims in relation to the number of exposures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
9 months ago
I agree, A makes more sense. It's a ratio of claims to exposures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
9 months ago
I think A is the correct answer. It's the number of claims divided by the number of exposures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
10 months ago
Option A seems like the most logical choice. The frequency of loss is the number of claims divided by the number of exposures, which makes perfect sense.
upvoted 0 times
Lamar
9 months ago
Calculating the number of claims divided by the number of exposures gives a clear picture of the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
10 months ago
Yes, it's important to calculate the frequency of loss accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
10 months ago
I agree, option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel