Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SOFE SOFA-CFE Exam - Topic 1 Question 111 Discussion

Posted by Nickole on May 01, 2025 at 01:55 PM

The frequency of loss is the:

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium SOFA-CFE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
HE
Helaine 10 months ago
No way, it can't be D, that's just wrong.
MA
Marquetta 10 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple?
BE
Benton 10 months ago
Totally agree, A is the correct answer!
BR
Brandee 10 months ago
I thought it might be B for a second!
CO
Cordelia 11 months ago
It's definitely A, claims divided by exposures.
MA
Malika 11 months ago
I definitely remember that frequency is about claims, but I can't remember if it's just claims or if there's something else involved.
LI
Lilli 11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the options. I don't recall anything about coverage extensions being involved in frequency calculations.
CA
Casandra 11 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about claims divided by exposures, so I might go with A.
RO
Royce 12 months ago
I think the frequency of loss is related to claims and exposures, but I'm not sure if it's just a simple division.
TA
Tamar 12 months ago
Okay, let me see... The frequency of loss is related to the number of claims and exposures, but I'm not sure if it's as simple as just dividing them. I'll have to double-check my notes to be sure.
OC
Octavio 12 months ago
The frequency of loss is a key concept in insurance, so I feel confident I can tackle this. I'll review the options and select the one that best matches the definition.
MU
Muriel 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
MI
Ming 1 year ago
This looks straightforward - the frequency of loss is just the number of claims divided by the number of exposures, so I'll go with option A.
SE
Selma 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about A. The frequency of loss is a simple ratio of claims to exposures - no need to overcomplicate it.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Selma
Yeah, A makes the most sense to me too.
AZ
Azzie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Selma
I agree, A seems like the most straightforward answer.
NO
Noel 1 year ago
I believe it's A as well, because it gives a clear ratio of claims to exposures
FI
Filiberto 1 year ago
Haha, D is just a weird combination of random insurance terms. The frequency of loss is all about the number of claims and exposures, so A is the clear winner.
VI
Vincenza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Filiberto
A is the most straightforward option for calculating the frequency of loss.
SU
Susana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Filiberto
Definitely, A is the formula for determining the frequency of loss.
LY
Lyla 1 year ago
↳ replying to Filiberto
Yeah, A makes the most sense when it comes to calculating the frequency of loss.
AL
Allene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Filiberto
I agree, A is the correct answer.
MA
Marti 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's C) The number of coverage extensions divided by the number of exposures
JO
Joesph 1 year ago
D looks like a trick question. The frequency of loss has nothing to do with the number of coverage extensions or retroactive data. A is the way to go.
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joesph
Definitely, A is the number of claims divided by the number of exposures.
JO
Joseph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joesph
Yeah, A is the correct formula for calculating the frequency of loss.
DI
Diego 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joesph
I agree, D does seem like a trick question. A makes more sense.
KA
Kati 1 year ago
I think it's A too, because it makes sense to calculate loss frequency that way
AL
Alita 1 year ago
A) The number of claims divided by the number of exposures
PH
Phil 1 year ago
I'm torn between A and B, but I think A is the correct answer. The frequency of loss should be based on the number of claims, not the number of exposures minus the number of loss.
KI
Kip 1 year ago
↳ replying to Phil
Yeah, A is the frequency of loss calculation. It's important to consider the number of claims in relation to the number of exposures.
CY
Cyndy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Phil
I agree, A makes more sense. It's a ratio of claims to exposures.
AN
Annabelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Phil
I think A is the correct answer. It's the number of claims divided by the number of exposures.
PE
Pete 1 year ago
Option A seems like the most logical choice. The frequency of loss is the number of claims divided by the number of exposures, which makes perfect sense.
LA
Lamar 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pete
Calculating the number of claims divided by the number of exposures gives a clear picture of the risk.
PA
Pansy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pete
Yes, it's important to calculate the frequency of loss accurately.
LU
Lucille 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pete
I agree, option A is the correct answer.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel