Haha, Glen's got a point. Maybe the loss reserve specialist is just rolling dice to come up with their estimates. In that case, D would be the right answer! Although I suspect the auditors would frown upon that approach.
Haha, Glen's got a point. Maybe the loss reserve specialist is just rolling dice to come up with their estimates. In that case, D would be the right answer! Although I suspect the auditors would frown upon that approach.
Wait, hold up. What if the loss reserve specialist just makes up their own 'assumed alternatives' and then uses that as the basis for their analysis? Shouldn't we be concerned about that too? Just a thought.
I agree, C is the way to go. Ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data is key for the loss reserve specialist to do their job effectively.
Controls over the preparation of supporting data seems like the most logical choice to me. The data used by the loss reserve specialist needs to be accurate and complete, so having controls in place for that supporting data is crucial.
I think controls over the preparation of accounting estimates could also be important, as those estimates play a significant role in determining the loss reserves.
I agree, having controls over the preparation of supporting data is essential for ensuring the accuracy of the data used by the loss reserve specialist.
Shawnda
2 months agoRoy
20 days agoLaquanda
27 days agoWilbert
1 months agoLorrine
1 months agoGlen
3 months agoCharlette
1 months agoDevon
1 months agoNatalie
1 months agoGerman
1 months agoShaun
1 months agoBillye
1 months agoDaniela
2 months agoMila
2 months agoWhitley
3 months agoAndra
3 months agoRoosevelt
3 months agoRessie
2 months agoLashaun
3 months agoSusana
3 months agoReynalda
3 months agoJordan
4 months ago