Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Snowflake Exam COF-R02 Topic 3 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's COF-R02 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 3
[All COF-R02 Questions]

How would a user execute a series of SQL statements using a task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Margurite at Sep 15, 2024, 05:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COF-R02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Matthew
10 months ago
I agree with Casie, option A is more efficient in executing a series of SQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
10 months ago
I prefer option D. Creating a task for each SQL statement seems more organized to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
10 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. It allows for multiple SQL statements in the task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
Is option A for real? Embedding SQL statements directly in the task body? That's like trying to write a novel in the margins of a postage stamp.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
9 months ago
D) Creating separate tasks for each SQL statement and sequencing them with a control task is another approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
9 months ago
B) Storing the SQL statements in a stored procedure and calling it from the task is a good practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
10 months ago
C) It's more common to use a stored procedure to execute multiple SQL statements in a task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
10 months ago
A) Yes, option A is a valid way to execute a series of SQL statements using a task.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Truman
11 months ago
Option D looks like a lot of work, setting up separate tasks just to run a series of SQL statements. I'd go with option C and let the stored procedure handle the heavy lifting.
upvoted 0 times
Claribel
10 months ago
Yes, it simplifies the process and makes it easier to manage the series of SQL statements within a task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
10 months ago
I agree, using a stored procedure to execute multiple SQL statements seems more efficient and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
11 months ago
Option D looks like a lot of work, setting up separate tasks just to run a series of SQL statements. I'd go with option C and let the stored procedure handle the heavy lifting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
11 months ago
Hah, option B is like trying to fit an entire meal into a single bite. Good luck with that one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
11 months ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but option C seems the most straightforward. Encapsulating the SQL logic in a stored procedure and calling it from the task makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Arleen
10 months ago
Yes, creating a task to call the stored procedure is a clean way to handle a series of SQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
10 months ago
It definitely helps in organizing and managing the SQL logic efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
10 months ago
I agree, using a stored procedure for multiple SQL statements simplifies the task execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
11 months ago
Option C does seem like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helaine
11 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. Using a stored procedure to execute multiple SQL statements in a single task seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
Celestina
11 months ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
11 months ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel